This paper constructs a scientific and systematic model for evaluating the quality of Civic and Political teaching in physical education courses with the core concept of establishing morality and combining the intrinsic requirements of collaborative parenting between physical education courses and Civic and Political education. The evaluation indicators use the hierarchical analysis method to assign weights to the established indicators, and at the same time, the consistency test is carried out to ensure that the weights are assigned reliably. The evaluation model is applied to a sports college, scored by questionnaire survey, and combined with the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to realize the rating division of the teaching quality of the college. At the beginning of the study, the first-level indicator “Chinese sportsmanship” was rated by experts as low, with a mean value of 2.4, so it was revised to “professionalism”. The importance of the indicator “ideal belief” compared with other level 1 indicators in the evaluation model ranges from 2.24 to 2.65, with the highest weight of 0.308. A university implemented the evaluation model in this paper, and the quality of the university’s comprehensive sports ideology teaching was rated at 4.36 points, which is a good rating. Among them, most students rated the secondary index under “ideal belief” as excellent. The results of the study can be used as a theoretical basis and a practical tool to promote the design and evaluation of the Civics teaching in college sports courses.