Contents

-

The {3}-Reconstruction and the {3}-Self-Duality of Tournaments

Abstract

Let T=(V,A) be a (finite) tournament and k be a non-negative integer. For every subset X of V\), the subtournament T[X]=(X,A(X×X)) of T, induced by X, is associated. The dual tournament of T, denoted by T, is the tournament obtained from T by reversing all its arcs. The tournament T is self-dual if it is isomorphic to its dual. T is (k)-self-dual if for each set X of k vertices, T[VX] is self-dual. T is strongly self-dual if each of its induced subtournaments is self-dual. A subset I of V is an interval of T if for a,bI and for xVI, (a,x)A if and only if (b,x)A. For instance, , V, and {x}, where xV, are intervals of T called trivial intervals. T is indecomposable if all its intervals are trivial; otherwise, it is decomposable. A tournament T, on the set V, is (k)-hypomorphic to T if for each set X on k vertices, T[VX] and T[VX] are isomorphic. The tournament T is (k)-reconstructible if each tournament (k)-hypomorphic to T is isomorphic to it.

Suppose that T is decomposable and |V|9. In this paper, we begin by proving the equivalence between the (3)-self-duality and the strong self-duality of T. Then we characterize each tournament (3)-hypomorphic to T. As a consequence of this characterization, we prove that if there is no interval X of T such that T[X] is indecomposable and |VX|2, then T is (3)-reconstructible. Finally, we conclude by reducing the (3)-reconstruction problem.