1. Introduction
The notion of Grundy colorings was introduced by Patrick Michael
Grundy in 1939. Author has dealing with combinatorial games contained
ideas that led to the concept of Grundy colorings of graphs.
Definition 1. A Grundy coloring [1,2,3] of a graph is a proper vertex coloring of (whose colors, as usual, are positive
integers) having the property that for every two colors and with , every vertex colored
has a neighbor colored .
Consequently, every Grundy coloring is a complete coloring.
Recall that a greedy coloring [4] of a
graph is obtained from an
ordering of the vertices of
in some manner, by defining , and once colors have been assigned to for some integer
with , is defined as the smallest
color not assigned to any neighbor of belonging to the set . The coloring
so produced is then a Grundy
coloring of . (i.e.), every greedy
coloring is a Grundy coloring. The maximum positive integer for which a graph has a Grundy -coloring is denoted by and is called the Grundy
chromatic number of or more
simply the Grundy number of . If
the Grundy number of a graph is
, then in any Grundy -coloring of (using the colors ), every vertex of colored must be adjacent to a vertex colored
for each integer with . Thus and so
for every graph . Since every Grundy coloring of a graph
is a proper coloring, it follows
that,
The Grundy number of a graph was perhaps introduced for the first
time by Christen and Selkow [5]. In [6], Erdös et., al. proved that the Grundy number
of a graph is in fact the same as ochromatic number of a graph which was
defined and studied independently by Simmons [7]. In [8] the authors studied the Grundy number of
hypercubes and determined the exact values. From computational point of
view, polynomial time algorithms for determining the Grundy number have
been given for trees in [9]
and for partial k-trees in [10]. In a manuscript [11] the NP-completeness of determining the Grundy
number of general graphs has been proved. Therefore, they gave an
affirmative answer to the problem posed in the graph coloring problem
book [12] which asks whether
determining the Grundy chromatic number of graphs is an NP-complete
problem.
2. Preliminaries
All graphs we consider are simple and fnite. A path is a trail where all its vertices are distinct. A closed
trail whose origin and internal vertices are distinct is called a . A cycle of length is called a -cycle.
A simple graph in which each pair of distinct vertices is joined by
an edge is called a complete graph and it is denoted by .
For any integer , the
wheel graph [13] is the vertex graph obtained by joining a
vertex to each of the vertices of the cycle
graph .
Cartesian Product of
graphs and is a graph such that the vertex set of
is the Cartesian Product
of ;
Vertices and are adjacent in
if and only if
is adjacent to in and .
is adjacent to in and .
3. Main Results
Theorem 1. Let and be a path graph of order and , then .
Proof. Let and let . We define the vertices . By symmentry, we need only consider the cases for
and .
Let ; ; ; ;
; ; ; .
We define a mapping as follows.
- Case (1):
-
For
and .
For .
- Case (2):
-
For
and .
The color patern as follows case(1) for .
;
;
;
.
- Case (3):
-
For
and .
The color patern as follows case(2) for .
;
;
;
.
- Case (4):
-
For
and .
The color patern as follows case(3) for .
;
;
;
.
- Case (5):
-
For
and .
The color patern as follows case(4) for .
;
;
;
.
- Case (6):
-
For
and .
The color patern as follows case(5) for and using the color patern as follows case(1)
for .
;
.
Hence . Assume that . By equation (1), we have . Since . Therefore
.
Theorem 2. Let and be a complete graph of order and , then .
Proof. Let and let . We define the vertices . We define a mapping as follows:
Hence . Assume that . By equation (1), we have . Since . Therefore
.
Theorem 3. Let and be a cycle graph of order and , then .
Proof. Let and let . We define the vertices . We define a mapping as follows:
- Case (1):
-
For .
- Subcase (1):
-
For .
- Subcase (2):
-
For .
- Subcase (3):
-
For .
- Case (2):
-
For .
The color patern as follows Case(1) for and .
- Case (3):
-
For .
The color patern as follows Case(1) for and .
Hence . Assume that . By equation (1), we have . Since . Therefore
.
Theorem 4. Let and be a wheel graph of order and , then .
Proof. Let and let , where and
are are adjacen to and . We define the
vertices . We define a mapping as
follows:
- Case (1):
-
For .
- Subcase (1):
-
For .
,
- Subcase (2):
-
For .
The color patern as follows Subcase(1) for .
,
.
- Subcase (2):
-
For .
The color patern as follows Subcase(1) for .
;
.
- Case (2):
-
For .
The color patern as follows Case(1) for .
.
- Case (3):
-
For .
The color patern as follows Case(1) for .
;
.
Hence . Assume that . Let the color and be the
distinct colors. Suppose we assign the color to the vertex . Now we assigned the colors to the neighbourhood
vertices of received the color .
Here either every two colors and
with or every vertex colored has not a neighbor colored . it contradicts by the grundy chromatic
number. Since . Therefore .
Theorem 5. Let and be a star graph of order and , then .
Proof. Let and let , wher and
are are adjacen to and . We define the
vertices . We define a mapping as
follows: Let and let . We define the vertices . We define a mapping as follows: Hence . Assume that . Let the color
and be the distinct colors. Suppose we
assign the color to the vertex
. Now we assigned the colors
to the neighbourhood
vertices of received the color .
Here either every two colors and
with or every vertex colored has not a neighbor colored . it contradicts by the grundy chromatic
number. Since . Therefore .
4. Conclusion
In this paper, we have demonstrated the new results on Grundy
chromatic number of Cartesian Product of path graph, complete graph,
cycle graph, complete graph, wheel graph and star graph. Furthermore, we
extend our work to generalized Grundy chromatic number of some other
product of graphs.
Conflict of
Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interests.