1. Introduction
Permutations are one of the most classical combinatorial structures
and their statistics are popular research objects in combinatorics.
Stanley [1] introduced
several definitions and propositions about permutations and the
statistics in detail, such as the cycles of permutations, (weak)
excedances, descents, inversions, major index, etc. Ehrenborg and
Steingrímsson [2]
established a formula for the number of permutations with a certain
excedance set and recursive formulas satisfied by these numbers. Chen
and Zhou [3] presented
a bijection between permutation tableaux of type of length and symmetric permutations of length
, and obtained a sign-imbalance
formula for permutation tableaux of type . Lewis [4] studied the exact formulas of the number
of alternating permutations of length and avoiding the pattern , respectively, by establishing a
bijection between permutations and standard Young tableaux of certain
shapes. Mezö [5] introduced Fubini numbers (or called
ordered Bell numbers) and their generating function and the recursive
relation.
In this paper, we introduce a special kind of permutations of length
, called half-exceeded symmetric
permutations, and give a combinatorial proof of the enumerative formula
of the structure, which is closely related to Stirling numbers of the
second kind and ordered Bell numbers. Especially, we construct Insertion
Procedure on half-exceeded symmetric permutations by defining the
inverse pairs, a new statistic of such permutations, which directly
implies the recursive formula of the number of half-exceeded symmetric
permutations of with exactly
inverse pairs.
2. Half-exceeded Symmetric
Permutations
In this section, we shall derive the enumeration of half-exceeded
symmetric permutations and concern about the distribution of their
inverse pairs.
For , let and let be a
permutation of . For any , if , then the number is called a fixed point of ; if , then is defined to be symmetric.
For any , if , then is called
an inverse pair of . A
number for which is called an
excedance of . If each
is excedance of , then we call a half-exceeded permutation
of . In addition, if is both half-exceeded and symmetric,
then it is defined as a half-exceeded symmetric permutation of
. For example, is a half-exceeded
symmetric permutation of , and and are its three inverse pairs.
Next we consider the ‘pattern’ of inverse pairs in half-exceeded
symmetric permutations. For each inverse pair of , we replace by ‘X’ and remove elements from . Then we get a word of length , denoted by . Since is a half-exceeded symmetric
permutation, is a word
possibly consisting of X’s and some
numbers in . We
define as the inversion
pattern of . For example,
both and are half-exceeded
symmetric permutations of and they have the same
inversion pattern XXX. Note that is an excedance of , which implies that there exists at
least one inverse pair in any half-exceeded symmetric permutation. For
the set of half-exceeded symmetric permutations of , let denote the number of different
inversion patterns containing exactly X’s,
for . Then we have
Theorem 1. For any and , , where is the Stirling number of the
second kind.
We shall construct a bijection between the set of inversion
patterns of length with X’s and
the set of partitions of with
blocks by induction.
For , the unique
half-exceeded symmetric permutation is and its inversion pattern is . So we set , the
unique partition of .
For and , let be an
inversion pattern of length with
X’s, where ,
. Let
be a partition of consisting of
single blocks. For any , if X, then we add to block of and make a union of the blocks
having non-empty intersections. Denote the result by . Since is an inversion pattern of a
half-exceeded symmetric permutation, each element X must greater than such that the blocks containing must be merged together. That
is to say, if consists of
X’s and numbers, then must have blocks, which is exactly the desired
partition of .
On the other hand, given a partition of with blocks, we establish an inversion
pattern of length with X’s by
following steps. Let be a block of , where and . We set X. If , then we set , for any . Obviously, is a
word of length consisting of
X’s and different numbers in . Since , , and the minimum elements of
each block of does not exist in
, the word must be an inversion pattern of
length for some half-exceeded
symmetric permutations. The proof is completed.
For example, as a partition of ,
corresponds to the inversion pattern
of length .
Furthermore, given an inversion pattern of length with X’s, we
could easily construct different
half-exceeded symmetric permutations of . As a consequence, the blocks of the corresponding partition
can be ordered in different ways, such that we have
ordered partitions of . Thus we conclude that
Corollary 1. For , we have
the number of ordered partitions of is equal to the number of
half-exceeded symmetric permutations of ;
the number of ordered partitions of with exactly blocks is equal to the number of
half-exceeded symmetric permutations of with exactly inverse pairs.
Let be the number of
half-exceeded symmetric permutations of with exactly inverse pairs and we call it ordered
Stirling number of the second kind. Then we have
Corollary 3. For , the number of half-exceeded
symmetric permutations of is
equal to ordered Bell number , i.e.,
In addition, based on the number of inverse pairs, we exhibit an
elementary Insertion Procedure to construct half-exceeded symmetric
permutations recursively.
Let be a
half-exceeded symmetric permutation of . If there exists a number satisfying , then is called a nearly fixed point
of . According to the existence
and location of those points, we construct a half-exceeded symmetric
permutation of by Insertion
Procedure as follows.
Insertion Procedure£º
Initial Step:
Let
be a word of length , where if , and otherwise , for .
Procedure:
Case 1: If there does not exist any nearly fixed point in , then we insert (or ) immediately to the left of , where is any one of the elements
satisfying .
Case 2: Let be the rightmost
nearly fixed point of . We have
three different ways of inserting element (or ) as follows:
(2-1) Let be any one
of the elements satisfying both and . Then we insert (or ) immediately to the left of , or
(2-2) Let be any one
of the elements satisfying both and . Then we replace by (or ), and insert immediately to the right of
, or
(2-3) We directly insert
immediately to the right of .
Here we get a word of length
and denote it by .
Final Step:
On the basis of the above procedure and the definition of symmetric
permutations, one could easily add the other elements to the right of , which obviously leads to a
half-exceeded symmetric permutation of .
An example is given for illustration. For , is a half-exceeded symmetric
permutation and it has two inverse pairs: and . Since there only exists , it has just one nearly fixed
point . Let and according to Case 2, we
could
(2-1) insert (or ) immediately to the left of and obtain (or ), or
(2-2) replace by (or ), and insert immediately to the right of , which deduces (or ), or
(2-3) insert to the right of
and get .
Finally, we obtain five half-exceeded symmetric permutations: , , , and . Notice that both and have two inverse pairs, being the
same as , while , and all have three inverse pairs.
It is clear that Insertion Procedure presents a simple proof of the
recursive relation of .
Proposition 1. For , the numbers satisfy the recurrence with the
initial condition and
for .
Acknowledgments
This work was partially supported by National Natural Science
Foundation of China (11601020, 11501014), National Key Research and
Development Project of China 2019YFC1606401.