For a graph \(G = (V, E)\), a set \(S \subseteq V\) is a \(k\)-packing if the distance between every pair of distinct vertices in \(S\) is at least \(k+1\), and \(\rho_k(G)\) is the maximum cardinality of a \(k\)-packing. A set \(S \subseteq V\) is a distance-\(k\) dominating set if for each vertex \(u \in V – S\), the distance \(d(u, v) \leq k\) for some \(v \in S\). Call a vertex set \(S\) a \(k\)-independent dominating set if it is both a \(k\)-packing and a distance-\(k\) dominating set, and let the \(k\)-independent domination number \(i_k(G)\) be the minimum cardinality of a \(k\)-independent dominating set. We show that deciding if a graph \(G\) is not \(k\)-equipackable (that is, \(i_k(G) < \rho_k(G)\)) is an NP-complete problem, and we present a lower bound on \(i_k(G)\). Our main result shows that the sequence \((i_1(G), i_2(G), i_3(G), \ldots)\) is surprisingly not monotone. In fact, the difference \(i_{k+1}(G) – i_k(G)\) can be arbitrarily large.