By combining the telescoping method with Cassini–like formulae, we evaluate, in closed forms, four classes of sums about products of two arctangent functions with their argument involving Pell and Pell–Lucas polynomials. Several infinite series identities for Fibonacci and Lucas numbers are deduced as consequences.
Pell and Pell–Lucas polynomials are defined (Horadam and Mahon [1] and Mahon and Horadam [2]) by the recurrence relations
They are polynomial extensions of Fibonacci and Lucas numbers
Like the well–known Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, the Pell and Pell–Lucas polynomials have many amazing properties and important applications in combinatorics and number theory as well as physical sciences (cf. Koshy [3, 4]). There exist numerous identities about Fibonacci and Lucas numbers (cf. [5, 6, 7, 8]). Some of them are extended by Mahon and Horadam [2] and Melham and Shanno [9] to the summation formulae containing a single arctangent function with its argument being Pell and Pell–Lucas polynomials. In view of their importance, it is natural to examine the product sums of two arctangent functions with their arguments involving Pell and Pell–Lucas polynomials. That is the primary motivation for the present work.
Recall the Cassini formula for Fibonacci numbers
Throughout the paper, we assume that
By making use of the following formulae (cf. Koshy [4]§14.7) for Pell
polynomials
They were directly utilized by Mahon and Horadam [2] and Melham and Shannon [9] to establish
Replacing
Theorem 1 (
Its limiting case as
Corollary 1 (Independent of
By specifying particular values of
Alternatively, (
Theorem 2 (
Now letting
Corollary 2.
We record eight interesting formulae by choosing particular values of
Analogously, there are also two formulae (cf. Koshy [4]§14.7) for
Pell–Lucas polynomials
Replacing
Theorem 3 (
When
Corollary 3.
As applications, we collect six infinite series identities.
Under the replacement
Theorem 4.
Its limiting case as
Corollary 4 (Independent of
In particular, two infinite series identities are given as follows:
By combining the Cassini–like formula (cf. Koshy [4]§14.10)
When
Theorem 5.
Its limiting case as
Corollary 5.
Two formulae about Fibonacci numbers and Pell numbers are contained as special cases.
Analogously for
Theorem 6.
The limiting case as
Corollary 6.
In particular, we record two identities about Fibonacci and Pell numbers.
In this section, the counterpart formulae for
Letting
Theorem 7.
As
Corollary 7.
Two special cases are produced below as examples
Analogously for
Theorem 8.
Letting
Corollary 8.
This formula further implies the two infinite series identities.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
1970-2025 CP (Manitoba, Canada) unless otherwise stated.