1. Introduction
An -regular graph is a
simple finite graph such that each of its vertices has degree . Regular graphs are one of the most
studied classes of graphs; especially those with symmetries such as
Cayley graphs. Let be a
finite group and let a generating set
for such that with ; a Cayley
graph has vertex set
consisting of the elements of and two vertices and are adjacent if for some . Cayley graphs are regular
but there exist non-Cayley vertex-transitive graphs. The Petersen graph
is a classic example of this fact.
The girth of a graph is the size of its shortest cycle. An
-graph is an -regular graph of girth . An -cage is an -graph of smallest possible order.
The diameter of a graph is the largest length between shortest
paths of any two vertices. An -graph is an -regular graph of diameter .
While the cage problem asks for the constructions of cages, the
degree-diameter problem asks for the construction of -graphs of maximum order. Both of
them are open and active problems (see ) in which,
frequently, it is considered the restriction to Cayley graphs, see .
In this paper, we study a similar problem using a well-known
parameter of coloration instead of girth or diameter. A -coloring of a graph is a partition of its vertices into
independent sets. The
chromatic number of
is the smallest number for which there exists a -coloring of .
We define an -graph as an -regular graph of chromatic number . In this work, we investigate the
-graphs of minimum order.
We also consider the case of Cayley -graphs.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows: In Section 2 we show the existence of -graphs, we define as the order of the smallest
-graph, and similarly, we
define as the order of
the smallest Cayley -graph.
We also exhibit lower and upper bounds on the orders of the extremal
graphs. We show that the Turán graphs , antihole graphs (the
complements of cycles) and are Cayley -graphs of order for some and . To prove that are extremal we use
instances of the Reed’s Conjecture for which it is true. In Section 3 we only consider non-Cayley graphs. We
give another upper bound for and we exhibit two families of
-graphs with a few number
of vertices which are extremal for some values of and . Finally, in Section 4 we study the small values and . We obtain a full table
of extremal -graphs except
for the pair .
2. Cayley -graphs
It is known that for any graph , where is the maximum degree of . Therefore, for any -graph we have that
Suppose that is a -graph. Hence is the empty graph, then . Therefore, the extremal graph is the
trivial graph. We can assume that .
Next, we prove that for any
and such that , there exists a
Cayley -graph .
We recall that the -Turán graph is the complete -partite graph on vertices whose partite sets are as
nearly equal in cardinality as possible, i.e., it is formed by
partitioning a set of
vertices (with ) into
the partition of independent sets
with order if and if . Every vertex in has degree for and every vertex in has degree for . The -Turán graph has
chromatic number , and size (see
)
Lemma 1. The -Turán graph is a Cayley graph.
Proof. Let be
the group and
. Then, the graph is isomorphic to . 
Before to continue, we recall some definitions. Given two graphs
and , the cartesian product is defined as the graph
with vertex set and two vertices and are adjacent if either and is adjacent with in , or and is adjacent with in . The following proposition appears in
.
Proposition 1. The cartesian product of two
Cayley graphs is a Cayley graph.
On the other hand, the chromatic number of is the maximum between
and , see . Now we can prove the following
theorem.
Theorem 1. For any and such that , there exists a
Cayley -graph.
Proof. Let where and . Consider the Cayley
graph . The graph
has chromatic number and it is an -regular graph of order .
Additionally, consider the graph . The graph has chromatic number and it is a -regular graph of order .
Therefore, the graph is a Cayley graph by Proposition 1 such that
it has chromatic number
regularity and order . 
Now, we define as the
order of the smallest -graph and as the order of the smallest
Cayley -graph. Hence, where with and .
To improve the lower bound we consider the -Turán graph . Suppose is an -graph. Let be a -coloring of resulting in the partition with for . Then the largest
possible size of occurs when
is a complete -partite graph with partite sets
and the
cardinalities of these partite sets are as equal as possible. This
implies that since has size . After some calculations we get that
Theorem 2. For any ,
where with .
An -graph of vertices is called extremal
-graph. Similarly, a
Cayley -graph of vertices is called extremal
Cayley -graph. When
the lower bound and the
upper bound of Theorem 1 are equal. We have the following
corollary.
Corollary 1. The Cayley graph is an extremal -graph.
In the remainder of this paper we exclusively work with , that is, when is not a divisor of .
2.1. Antihole graphs
A hole graph is a cycle of length at least four. An
antihole graph is the complement of a hole graph . Note that a hole graph and its
antihole graph are both connected if and only if their orders are at
least five. In this subsection we prove that antihole graphs of order
are extremal -graphs for any at least six. There are two cases
depending of the number of vertices.
for and .
The graph has regularity and chromatic number . Any -graph has an even number of
vertices and at least
vertices.
If , then . Therefore we have the
following result:
for all
.
for and .
The graph has regularity and chromatic number . Any -graph has at least
vertices.
If , we have that . Therefore for all .
Suppose that is a -graph of vertices. Then , i.e., is the complement of a matching of
edges. Then , a contradiction. Therefore
for all
.
Therefore, we have the following theorem.
Theorem 3. The antihole graphs of order are extremal -graphs.
A hole graph is also considered a -factor since is a spanning -regular graph. For short, we denote the
disjoint union of cycles of
lenght as .
Let be an union of cycles
for
with . Note
that the complement of is the join of the complement of
cycles.
Theorem 4. The graph is extremal if .
Proof. Let . The graph has order , regularity
and chromatic number
since the the chromatic numbers of , , , …, are
respectively.
Any -graph has at least
vertices for . If then is extremal, that is, when i.e. when 
Moreover, we have the following results.
Theorem 5. Since is extremal then
When is even, if is a graph of order such that , then is extremal.
When is odd, if is a graph of order such that , then is extremal.
Corollary 1. Since the antihole graphs of order
are -graphs, then there exist many
non-isomorphic extremal -graphs (not necessarily
Cayley).
For instance, there are three extremal -graphs, namely, , and . See also Table 1.
2.2. The case of
In this subsection, we discuss the case of , i.e., the -graphs of minimum order. We have
the following bounds so far:
We prove that the upper bound is correct except for and maybe for . To achieve it, we assume
that there exist -graphs of
order , that is Now, we use a
bound for the chromatic number arising from the Reed’s Conjecture, see
. We recall the
clique number of a graph
is the largest for which has a complete subgraph of order .
Conjecture 1. For every graph ,
It is known that the conjecture is true for graphs satisfying
Equation [Equation1], see . It follows that for any -graph of order , that is, or .
.
Let be a clique of and . There is a set of
edges from and . Therefore, if is the order of and is the number of edges in
, then We obtain that , a contradiction.
.
Let be a clique of and . There is a set of
edges from to . Therefore, if is the order of and is the number of edges in
, then We obtain that , hence, and has to be . Since every vertex in has degree in ,
has at least two neighbours in .
By symmetry, is the union of two
complete graphs with the
addition of two perfect matchings between them. Its complement is a
-regular bipartite graph. Any
perfect matching of induce a
-coloring in , a contradiction.
We have the following results.
If is odd then the order of
any -regular graph is even,
therefore:
Corollary 1. For any an odd number, .
We have that is the
extremal -graph. Next, assume
that is an even number and
there exists a -graph of vertices. Owing to the fact that
where
is the independence
number of , we get that .
In was proved
that the Reed’s conjecture holds for graphs of order satisfying . In the case
of the graph , we have that It follows that . Newly,
we have two cases:
.
As we saw before, let be a
clique of and . There is a set of
edges from and . Therefore, if is the order of and is the number of edges in
, then We obtain that , a contradiction.
.
In was proved
that every graph satisfies Hence, for the graph we have that After some
calculations we get that , otherwise,
Finally, we have the following theorem.
Theorem 6. For any such that , Moreover, if then and if then
We point out that if there exists an extremal -graph of vertices for , then has clique number , a clique of order for which has edges, is Hamiltonian-connected and it has
independence number such
that , see
.
3. Non-Cayley constructions
In this section we improve the upper bound of given on Theorem 1 by exhibiting a construction of graphs
not necessarily Cayley. We assume that is not a multiple of , therefore . Additionally, we show
two more constructions which are tight for some values.
3.1. Upper bound
To begin with, take the Turán graph , for , with and the partition
such that if and if . Every vertex in
for has degree and every vertex in for has degree .
Next, we define the graph as the graph formed by two
copies and of with the addition of a
matching between the vertices of degree of and the vertices of degree of in the natural way. In consequence,
the graph is an -regular graph of order and chromatic number . To obtain its chromatic number,
suppose that has the
vertex partition , then the
vertices of have the color
in and the vertices of are colored mod in . Hence and then .
Theorem 7. For , then where with .
3.2. The graph
In this subsection we give a better construction for some values of
and . Consider the -Turán graph
such that and partition for
, with and with .
We claim that is even or is even. To prove it, assume that
and are odd. Hence, if is even, then is odd, is odd and is odd, a contradiction. If is odd, then is even, is odd and is odd, newly, a contradiction.
Now, we define the graph of regularity as follows: If is even, the removal of a perfect
matching between and for all of produces . If is odd then is even, therefore, the removal of a
perfect matching between and
for all and a perfect
matching between and , and , and and where is a
set of vertices for , of produces .
The graphs improve
the upper bound given in Theorem 1 for some
numbers and : Hence, if , the
construction gives extremal graphs, that is, when
Theorem 8. Let ,
and . Then the graph defined above is an
extremal -graph
when is even or is even.
3.3. The graph
Consider the -Turán graph with partition . Now, we define the graph
with as follows: consider two
parts of , e.g.
and , and vertices of these two parts and .
The removal of the edges
for when (all the edges between and except for a matching)
and the addition of the edges and for when (all the edges between the
vertices and all the edges
between the vertices ) results
in the graph .
The graph is a -regular graph of order . Its chromatic number is because the partition
is a proper coloring with
colors. Moreover, the graph has a clique of vertices, namely, the vertices
where for and .
The graphs improve the
upper bound given in Theorem 1: Hence, if , the construction
gives extremal graphs, that is, when
Theorem 9. Let and . The graph defined above is an extremal
-graph when .
4. Small values
In this section we exhibit extremal -graphs of small orders. These
exclude the extremal graphs given before. Table 1 shows the
extremal -graphs for and .
Extremal -graphs.
|
|
|
– |
– |
– |
|
|
|
|
– |
– |
|
|
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1. Extremal -graph
Suppose that is an extremal
-graph of order , i.e., its order equals the lower bound
given in Theorem 1. Then its complement is regular. That is, is or or . By Theorem 1, the complement of or or has chromatic number . Since is -regular, a -graph of order does not exist and therefore is the best possible. The graph is an extremal -graph with vertices.
4.2. Extremal -graphs for
Let be an extremal -graph. Its order is at least . Since its degree is odd, its order is
at least . The graph is an extremal -graph.
Now, suppose that is an
extremal -graph. has at least vertices. Newly, because it has an odd
regularity, has at least vertices. If this is the case, its
complement is a regular graph.
The graph has chromatic
number . It is unique and it is
Cayley.
4.3. Extremal -graph
Any -graph has vertices, i.e., its order equals the
lower bound given in Theorem 2. Suppose that
there exist at least one of degree . Let a partition by independent
sets. Some of the parts, , has
at least five vertices. Since the graph is -regular, has exactly vertices. The induced graph of and is a bipartite regular graph of an
odd number of vertices, a contradiction. Then, any -graph has at least vertices.
Consider the graph with
partition and the sets
partition are , , . The
removal of the edges
is the graph which is
the extremal -graph.
Acknowledgment
We thank Robert Jajcay for useful discussions. C. Rubio-Montiel was
partially supported by PAIDI grant 007/19. The authors wish to thank the
anonymous referees of this paper for their suggestions and remarks.
Conflict of
Interest
The author declares no conflict of interests.