A Sufficient Condition for Fractional (2,b,k)-Critical Covered Graphs

Jie Wu1
1School of Economic and management, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212100, China.

Abstract

Zhou, Xu and Sun [S. Zhou, Y. Xu, Z. Sun, Degree conditions for fractional (a,b,k)-critical covered graphs, Information Processing Letters 152(2019)105838] defined the concept of a fractional (a,b,k)-critical covered graph, namely, a graph G is a fractional (a,b,k)-critical covered graph if after removing any k vertices of G, the remaining graph of G is a fractional [a,b]-covered graph. In this paper, we prove that a graph G with δ(G)2+k is fractional (2,b,k)-critical covered if bind(G)>b+kb1, where k0 and b2+k are two integers.

Keywords: minimum degree, binding number, fractional [a,b]-factor, fractional [a,b]-covered graph, fractional [a,b,k]-critical covered graph

1. Introduction

All graphs discussed here are finite, undirected and simple. Let G be a graph with vertex set V(G) and edge set E(G). For every xV(G), we use dG(x) to denote the degree of x in G, and let NG(x) denote the neighborhood of x in G. Let X be a subset of V(G). We write NG(X)=xXNG(x), and write G[X] for the subgraph of G induced by X. Define GX=G[V(G)X]. A subset XV(G) is called independent if G[X] does not admit edges. The minimum degree of G is denoted by δ(G), the number of isolated vertices in G is denoted by i(G), and the complete graph of order n is denoted by Kn. The binding number of G is defined by Woodall [1] as bind(G)=min{|NG(X)||X|:XV(G),NG(X)V(G)}.

Let a,b and k be three nonnegative integers with ab. Then a spanning subgraph F of G is called an [a,b]-factor of G if adF(x)b holds for every xV(G). Let h be a function from E(G) to [0,1]. Then we call G[Fh] a fractional [a,b]-factor of G with an indicator function h if aexh(e)b for all xV(G), where Fh={e:eE(G),h(e)>0}. In particular, when a=b=r, a fractional [a,b]-factor is a fractional r-factor. A fractional [a,b]-factor is just an [a,b]-factor if h(e){0,1} for each eE(G). A graph G is a fractional [a,b]-covered graph if for any eE(G), there exists a fractional [a,b]-factor G[Fh] such that h(e)=1. In particular, when a=b=r, a fractional [a,b]-covered graph is a fractional r-covered graph. A graph G is a fractional (a,b,k)-critical covered graph if after removing any k vertices of G, the remaining graph of G is a fractional [a,b]-covered graph. In particular, when a=b=r, a fractional (a,b,k)-critical covered graph is a fractional (r,k)-critical covered graph.

Many scholars studied the problems of factors of graphs and fractional factors of graphs. Zhou, Xu and Sun [2] derived a degree condition for the existence of fractional (a,b,k)-critical covered graphs. Zhou [3] presented a neighborhood union condition for a graph being a fractional (a,b,k)-critical covered graph. In this paper, we study the fractional (2,b,k)-critical covered graph problem, and get a result on fractional (2,b,k)-critical covered graphs which is the following theorem.

Theorem 1. Let k0 and b2+k be two integers, and let G be a graph with δ(G)2+k. If bind(G)>b+kb1, then G is fractional (2,b,k)-critical covered.

We immediately get the following corollary by setting k=0 in Theorem 1.

Corollary 1. Let b2 be an integer, and let G be a graph with δ(G)2. If bind(G)>bb1, then G is fractional [2,b]-covered.

We promptly obtain the following corollary if b=2 in Corollary 1.

Corollary 2. Let G be a graph with δ(G)2. If bind(G)>2, then G is fractional 2-covered.

2. The Proof of Theorem 1

We begin this section with one definition. For any XV(G) and Y={x:xV(G)X,dGX(x)a}, we define ε(X,Y) as follows: ε(X,Y)={2,if X is not independent,1,if X is independent and there is an edgejoiningX and V(G)(XY), or there is anedge e=xyjoining X and Y such that dGX(y)=a for yY,0,otherwise.

Li, Yan and Zhang [4] posed a necessary and sufficient condition for a graph to be a fractional [a,b]-covered graph, which is a special case of Li, Yan and Zhang’s fractional (g,f)-covered graph theorem.

Theorem 2. ([4]) Let ba0 be two integers. Then a graph G is a fractional [a,b]-covered graph if and only if for any XV(G), a|Y|dGX(Y)b|X|ε(X,Y), where Y={x:xV(G)X,dGX(x)a}.

The proof of Theorem 1 depends heavily on the following theorem, which is equivalent to Theorem 2.

Theorem 3. ([4]) Let ba0 be two integers. Then a graph G is a fractional [a,b]-covered graph if and only if for any XV(G), j=0a1(aj)pj(GX)b|X|ε(X,Y), where Y={x:xV(G)X,dGX(x)a} and pj(GX) denotes the number of vertices in GX with degree j.

Proof of Theorem 1.  Let QV(G) with |Q|=k, and let H=GQ. It suffices to verify that H is a fractional [2,b]-covered graph. Suppose, to the contrary, that H is not a fractional [2,b]-covered graph. Then it follows from Theorem 3 that (1)2p0(HX)+p1(HX)b|X|ε(X,Y)+1 for some XV(H), where Y={x:xV(H)X,dHX(x)2}.

We write Y0={x:xV(H)X,dHX(x)=0} and Y1={x:xV(H)X,dHX(x)=1}. Obviously, we obtain |Y0|=p0(HX)=i(HX) and |Y1|=p1(HX). The following proof will be divided into three cases.

Case 1. Y1=.

Clearly, p1(HX)=0. Combining this with (1) and ε(X,Y)|X|, we admit 2p0(HX)=2p0(HX)+p1(HX)b|X|ε(X,Y)+1b|X||X|+11, namely, (2)p0(HX)12.

According to (2) and the integrity of p0(HX), we get p0(HX)1, which implies that there exists x0V(H)X with dHX(x0)=0. Combining this with δ(G)2+k and H=GQ, we have 2+kδ(G)dG(x0)dGQ(x0)+|Q|=dH(x0)+kdHX(x0)+|X|+k=|X|+k, that is, (3)|X|2.

Note that Y0 by p0(HX)1, and so NG(Y0)V(G). In terms of (1), (3), ε(X,Y)2, p1(HX)=|Y1|=0 and b2+k2, we get bind(G)|NG(Y0)||Y0||Q|+|X||Y0|=k+|X|p0(HX)=2k+2|X|2p0(HX)+p1(HX)2k+2|X|b|X|ε(X,Y)+12k+2|X|b|X|1=2b(1+bk+1b|X|1)2b(1+bk+12b1)=4+2k2b12b+2k2b1<2b+2k2b2=b+kb1, which contradicts bind(G)>b+kb1.

Case 2.Y1 and Y1=NHX(Y1).

We easily see that |Y1|=2t2, where t is a positive integer. For x1Y1, we admit dHX(x1)=1. Then using H=GQ and δ(G)2+k, we derive 2+kδ(G)dG(x1)dGQ(x1)+|Q|=dH(x1)+kdHX(x1)+|X|+k=1+|X|+k, namely, |X|1.

If |X|=1, then p0(HX)=0 (since δ(G)2+k) and ε(X,Y)1. It follows from (1) and the hypothesis of Theorem 1 that b+kb1<bind(G)|NG(Y1{x1})||Y1{x1}||Q|+|X|+|Y1|1|Y1|1=k+|Y1||Y1|1=k+p1(HX)p1(HX)1=1+1+kp1(HX)1=1+1+k2p0(HX)+p1(HX)11+1+kb|X|ε(X,Y)1+1+kb|X|1=1+1+kb1=b+kb1, which is a contradiction. Next, we consider |X|2.

In light of (1), |X|2, ε(X,Y)2 and b2+k, we deduce bind(G)|NG(Y0(Y1{x1}))||Y0(Y1{x1})||Q|+|X|+|Y1|1|Y0|+|Y1|1=k+|X|+p1(HX)1p0(HX)+p1(HX)1=1+k+|X|p0(HX)p0(HX)+p1(HX)11+k+|X|p0(HX)b|X|ε(X,Y)p0(HX)1+k+|X|p0(HX)b|X|2p0(HX)1+k+|X|b|X|2=1+1b(1+2+bkb|X|2)1+1b(1+2+bk2b2)=2b+k2b22b+2k2b2=b+kb1, which contradicts bind(G)>b+kb1.

Case 3.Y1 and Y1NHX(Y1).

In this case, there exists x2NHX(Y1)Y1 with dHX(x2)2, and so there exists x3Y1 such that x3x2E(HX) and x3xE(HX) for any xV(H)(X{x2}). Thus, we deduce |NG(Y0Y1)||Q|+|X|+|Y1|. Combining this with (1), |X|1 (since Y1 and δ(G)2+k), ε(X,Y)2, b2+k and the hypothesis of Theorem 1, we infer b+kb1<bind(G)|NG(Y0Y1)||Y0Y1||Q|+|X|+|Y1||Y0|+|Y1|=k+|X|+p1(HX)p0(HX)+p1(HX)=1+k+|X|p0(HX)p0(HX)+p1(HX)=1+k+|X|p0(HX)2p0(HX)+p1(HX)p0(HX)1+k+|X|p0(HX)b|X|ε(X,Y)+1p0(HX)1+k+|X|p0(HX)b|X|1p0(HX)1+k+|X|b|X|1=1+1b(1+1+bkb|X|1)1+1b(1+1+bkb1)=b+kb1, which is a contradiction. This finishes the proof of Theorem 1. ◻

3. Sharpness of Theorem 1

We show that the binding number condition bind(G)>b+kb1 in Theorem 1 cannot be replaced by bind(G)b+kb1.

We construct a graph G=K1+k(b2K2), where means “join”, and b and k are two integers such that b2+k and b is even. We easily deduce that bind(G)=b+kb1. Let Q=V(Kk)V(K1+k) and H=GQ=K1(b2K2). We select X=V(K1) and Y={x:xV(H)X,dHX(x)2} in H. It is obvious that ε(X,Y)=1 by the definition of ε(X,Y). Hence, we admit 2p0(HX)+p1(HX)=b=b|X|ε(X,Y)+1>b|X|ε(X,Y). In light of Theorem 3, H is not a fractional [2,b]-covered graph, and so G is not a fractional (2,b,k)-critical covered graph.

References:

  1. Woodall, D.R., 1973. The binding number of a graph and its Anderson number. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 15(3), pp.225-255.

  2. Zhou, S., Xu, Y. and Sun, Z., 2019. Degree conditions for fractional (a, b, k)-critical covered graphs. Information Processing Letters, 152, p.105838.

  3. Zhou, S., 2022. A neighborhood union condition for fractional (a, b, k)-critical covered graphs. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 323, pp.343-348.

  4. Li, Z., Yan, G. and Zhang, X., 2002. On fractional (g, f)-covered graphs. OR Transactions (China), 6(4), pp.65-68.