1. Introduction
All graphs discussed here are finite, undirected and simple. Let
be a graph with vertex set and edge set . For every , we use to denote the degree of in , and let denote the neighborhood of in . Let be a subset of . We write ,
and write for the subgraph of
induced by . Define . A subset is called independent if
does not admit edges. The
minimum degree of is denoted by
, the number of isolated
vertices in is denoted by , and the complete graph of order
is denoted by . The binding number of is defined by Woodall [1] as
Let and be three nonnegative integers with
. Then a spanning subgraph
of is called an -factor of if holds for every . Let be a function
from to . Then we call a fractional -factor of with an indicator function if for
all , where . In
particular, when , a
fractional -factor is a
fractional -factor. A fractional
-factor is just an -factor if for each . A graph is a fractional -covered graph if for any , there exists a fractional
-factor such that . In particular, when , a fractional -covered graph is a fractional -covered graph. A graph is a fractional -critical covered graph if after
removing any vertices of , the remaining graph of is a fractional -covered graph. In particular, when
, a fractional -critical covered graph is a
fractional -critical covered
graph.
Many scholars studied the problems of factors of graphs and
fractional factors of graphs. Zhou, Xu and Sun [2] derived a degree condition for the existence of
fractional -critical covered
graphs. Zhou [3] presented a
neighborhood union condition for a graph being a fractional -critical covered graph. In this
paper, we study the fractional -critical covered graph problem,
and get a result on fractional -critical covered graphs which is
the following theorem.
Theorem 1. Let and be two integers, and let be a graph with . If then is fractional -critical covered.
We immediately get the following corollary by setting in Theorem 1.
Corollary 1. Let be an integer, and let be a graph with . If then is fractional -covered.
We promptly obtain the following corollary if in Corollary 1.
Corollary 2. Let be a graph with . If then is fractional -covered.
2. The Proof of Theorem 1
We begin this section with one definition. For any and , we define as follows:
Li, Yan and Zhang [4]
posed a necessary and sufficient condition for a graph to be a
fractional -covered graph,
which is a special case of Li, Yan and Zhang’s fractional -covered graph theorem.
Theorem 2. ([4]) Let be two integers. Then a graph is a fractional -covered graph if and only if for
any , where .
The proof of Theorem 1 depends heavily on the following theorem,
which is equivalent to Theorem 2.
Theorem 3. ([4]) Let be two integers. Then a graph is a fractional -covered graph if and only if for
any , where and denotes
the number of vertices in with
degree .
Proof of Theorem 1. Let with , and let . It suffices to verify that is a fractional -covered graph. Suppose, to the
contrary, that is not a
fractional -covered graph.
Then it follows from Theorem 3 that for some , where .
We write and . Obviously, we obtain and . The following proof will
be divided into three cases.
Case 1. .
Clearly, . Combining
this with (1) and , we admit namely,
According to (2) and the integrity of , we get which implies that there
exists with
. Combining this with
and , we have that is,
Note that by
, and so . In terms of (1), (3),
, and , we get which contradicts .
Case 2. and .
We easily see that , where is a positive integer. For , we admit . Then using and , we derive namely,
If , then (since ) and . It follows from
(1)
and the hypothesis of Theorem 1 that which is a contradiction. Next, we consider .
In light of (1), , and , we deduce which contradicts .
Case 3. and .
In this case, there exists with , and so there exists
such that and for any . Thus,
we deduce . Combining this with (1), (since and ), , and the hypothesis of Theorem 1, we
infer which is a contradiction. This finishes the proof
of Theorem 1. 
3. Sharpness of Theorem 1
We show that the binding number condition in Theorem 1
cannot be replaced by .
We construct a graph , where
means “join”, and and are two integers such that and is even. We easily deduce that . Let and . We select
and in . It
is obvious that
by the definition of . Hence, we admit
In light of Theorem 3, is not a
fractional -covered graph, and
so is not a fractional -critical covered graph.