1. Introduction
Let denote a simple
connected graph. The Randić (or connectivity) index is defined in [4] by , where denotes the degree of a vertex
in , and is called the
weight of the edge in the Randić
index. This index was extensively studied in mathematical chemistry. The
harmonic index is defined in
[5] as , where is called the weight of the edge in the harmonic index. In [6], the authors considered the
relation between the harmonic index and the eigenvalues of graphs. In
[7], the author presented the
minimum and maximum values of harmonic index on simple connected graphs
and trees, and characterized the corresponding extremal graphs. In [8], the authors gave a best
possible lower bound for the harmonic index of a graph (a triangle-free
graph, respectively) with minimum degree at least two and characterized
the corresponding extremal graphs.
In 1968, Harary and Palmer [9] defined an -plex as an -dimensional complex in which every
-simplex with is contained in an -complex. For convenience, 0-simplexes,
1-simplexes, and 2-simplexes are called points, lines, and cells
respectively. The two-dimensional trees, also called 2-trees can now be
defined inductively. The 2-plex with three points is a 2-tree, and a
2-tree with points is obtained
from a 2-tree with points by
adjoining a new point adjoint to
each of two adjacent points and
together with the accompanying
cell . The definition of a
-tree for is similar. In graph theory, a
-tree is a chordal graph all of
whose maximal cliques are the same size and all of whose minimal clique
separators are also all the same size . Every -tree may be formed by starting with a
-vertex complete graph and
then repeatedly adding vertices in such a way that each added vertex has
exactly neighbors that form a
clique (see [10]). The minimum
degree of a -tree is . And a 1-tree is a tree in traditional
graph theory.
Delorme et al. (2002) [1]
put forward a conjecture concerning the minimum Randić index among all
connected graphs with vertices
and the minimum degree at least .
Conjecture 1. ([1]) For any connected graph with vertices and the minimum degree at
least , ,
the equality holds if and only if , which arises from complete bipartite graph
by joining each pair of
vertices in the partite set with
vertices by a new edge.
Using linear programming, Pavlovic [11] proved that Conjecture 1 holds when or (see also [12] for further results proved by
quadratic programming). Liu [3] showed that Conjecture 1 is true given the
graph contains vertices of degree
and it is true among -trees. But, Aouchiche and Hansen [13] refuted the conjecture by using
the AutoGraphiX 2 system, and modified the conjecture. Motivated by this
paper, a conjecture related to the minimum harmonic index among all
connected graphs with vertices
and the minimum degree at least
was also posed in [2].
Conjecture 2. ([2]) Let be a
graph with vertices and
the minimum degree , where . Then with equality
if and only if .
Deng et al posed the following conjecture in [14].
Conjecture 3. ([14]) For any simple and connected graph with vertices and the minimum degree at
least , with equality if and only if .
A counter-example to Conjecture 1 is the graph
obtained from by deleting two
independent edges.
Motivated by the paper [3]
and [15], here, we will show
that Conjecture 2 and Conjecture 3 is true for a
connected graph containing
vertices of degree with vertices and the minimum degree at
least , and it is also true for a
-tree. For additional results on
this index, see [16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34].
2. Main Results
In the following, we first determine the minimum value of of a graph on vertices with vertices of degree , and show that Conjecture 1 and
Conjecture 1 is true for a graph containing vertices of degree .
Lemma 1. ([8]) If is
an edge with maximum weight in ,
then .
Theorem 1. Let be a graph with vertices and vertices of degree . Then with equality if and only if .
. It is easy to compute that .
Let be the graph with the
minimum harmonic index among all graphs with vertices and vertices of degree . Suppose denotes the set of vertices of degree in and . Then the subgraph induced by
is a clique. If , then the
subgraph induced by is not an
empty graph. Since the degree of every vertex in is at most , an edge with the maximum weight belongs to the
subgraph induced by . By Lemma 1, and is also a graph with vertices and vertices of degree , a contradiction. So, the subgraph
induced by is an empty graph, and
.
Theorem 1 shows that Conjecture 2 and Conjecture 3 is true
for a connected graph on vertices
with vertices of degree , certainly, the minimum degree at
least .
Using linear programming, Liu [3] showed that Conjecture 1 is true for a
connected graph with vertices and
vertices of degree . In the following, we give a shorter
proof of this result.
Lemma 2. ([35]) Let be
an edge with maximum weight in a graph . Then .
Theorem 2. ([3]) Let be a
graph with vertices and vertices of degree . Then with equality if and only if .
. It is easy to compute that .
Let be the graph with the
minimum Randić index among all graphs with vertices and vertices of degree . denotes the set of vertices of degree in and . Then the subgraph induced by
is a clique. If , then the
subgraph induced by is not an
empty graph. Since the degree of every vertex in is at most , an edge with the maximum weight belongs to the
subgraph induced by . By Lemma 1,
and is also a graph with vertices and vertices of degree , a contradiction. So, the subgraph
induced by is an empty graph, and
.
Now, we consider the harmonic index of a -tree. The following lemma can be proved
easily and it will be used in the back.
Lemma 4. Let be a -tree with () vertices. is a
vertex of degree in and its neighbors and , then where .
Moreover, , and if and only if .
. By the definition of a -tree,
the subgraph induced by is a
clique. We have
Note that the partial derivatives for , and (), we have if and only if equalities hold throughout the above
inequalities, i.e., and
for all (), and is .
Theorem 3. Let be a -tree with vertices. Then with equality
if and only if .
. We prove the result by induction on . The result is true for , since a -tree with is a complete graph and . Assume that the
result is true for any -tree with
vertices. Let be a -tree with vertices. From the structure of a
-tree, there is a vertex of degree such that is a -tree with vertices. Denote and . By Lemma 3 and the
inductive assumption, we have with equality if and only if .
Theorem 1 shows that Conjecture 2 and Conjecture 3 is true
for -trees. Note that a -tree is a tree, we get the following
result immediately.
Corollary 1. ([7]) Let be a
tree with vertices. Then with equality if and only if .
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interests.