On-line and non-line weighted generalized Fibonomial sums

Ilker Akkus1, Gonca Kizilaslan1
1Kirikkale University, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Arts, 71450 Kirikkale, Turkey

Abstract

In this paper we consider some new weighted and alternating weighted generalized Fibonomial sums and the corresponding qforms. A generalized form of weight sequences which contains squares in subscripts is discussed for the first time in the literature. The main key to get success in sums is an ability to change one sum into another that is simpler in some way. Thus, in order to prove these sums by doing some manipulations and tricks, our approach is to use classical qanalysis, in particular a formula of Rothe, a version of Cauchy binomial theorem and Gauss identity.

Keywords: Gaussian binomial coefficient, Fibonomial coefficient, Sums, q-binomial theorem

1. Introduction

Binomial coefficients and their generalizations occur frequently in combinatorics, number theory, and discrete mathematics. There are many generalizations of the binomial coefficients in the literature. One of them is the sequential generalization, i.e. replacing the natural numbers by the terms of an arbitrary sequence (an) of real or complex numbers. A generalization which is obtained by choosing nth Fibonacci number Fn instead of an is known as Fibonomial coefficients. For another well-known generalization of binomial coefficients, let q be a variable, and let an=1+q+q2++qn. Then we get the q binomial coefficient, which is known to be a polynomial in q with nonnegative integer coefficients (a Gaussian polynomial). qbinomial coefficients have very rich properties and many of the properties of binomial coefficients can be proved more easily by using these coefficients. Both Fibonomial coefficients and qbinomial coefficients are interested in by several authors and so their various properties have been found. During this study, we will frequently use the relationships between Fibonomial coefficients and qbinomial coefficients.

For nm1 the Fibonomial coefficient is defined by nkF:=F1F2Fn(F1F2Fk)(F1F2Fnk), with n0F=nnF=1 where Fn is the nth Fibonacci number. For n2, Falcon and Plaza [4,5] define two second order linear recurrences Un=pUn1+Un2, U0=0, U1=1,Vn=pUn1+Vn2, V0=2, V1=p, and named these sequences as kFibonacci numbers and kLucas numbers by taking k instead of p, respectively. The Binet forms of these numbers and their qforms are Un=αnβnαβ=αn11qn1q and Vn=αn+βn=αn(1+qn) , where α and β are the roots of the characteristic polynomial of the recurrences and q=βα=α2 so that α=iq. Using the sequence {Un}, for nk1, the generalized Fibonomial coefficient is defined by nkU:=U1U2Un(U1U2Uk)(U1U2Unk), with n0U=nnU=1. If we take the indices in a linear arithmetic progression, we obtain the generalized Fibonomial coefficients nkU,m:=UmU2mUnm(UmU2mUkm)(UmU2mU(nk)m), for a nonnegative integer m. The usual Fibonomial coefficients nkF can be obtained by taking m=p=1, and when m=1 the coefficient nkU,m turns into the generalized Fibonomial coefficients nkU. As in binomial coefficients, it is surprising that these quantities will always take integer values. The Fibonomial coefficients appear in several places in the literature (for more details, we refer to [2,6,17,7]).

Throughout the paper, the set of natural numbers is denoted as usual N. The qPochhammer symbol reads as (x;y)0=1 and (x;y)n=(1x)(1xy)(1xyn1) for two indeterminates x and y and nN. Then for n,kN the generalized Gaussian binomial coefficients are given by nkx,y:=(x;y)n(x;y)k(x;y)nk, with nkx,y=0 for k<0 or k>n which become the usual qbinomial coefficients nkq for x=y.

In the literature there exists several sums involving Gaussian qbinomial coefficients with weight functions. Also some sums including Fibonomial coefficients are evaluated. By taking q=β/α, we can see that there exists a correspondence between these two classes of sums and hence using an appropriate convenience gives us that we can evaluate one class of sums from another. Thus our approach is essentialy based on these connections, that is nkU,m=αmk(nk)nkqm.

Fibonomial coefficients and qbinomial coefficients have very strong relationships because they can be easily converted to each other. In this way, while an identity associated with Fibonomial coefficients is proved, it is written in the form of qbinomial coefficient and proof is made accordingly. Also a proven qbinomial identity is true not only for a specific selection of q, but also for all real or complex values.

We recall some well known identities related to the qidentities. Gauss identity is given as k=0n(1)k2nkq=k=1n(1q2k1).

Then for a nonnegative integer m, we have (1)k=0n(1)k2nkqm=k=1n(1qm(2k1)).

A version of Cauchy binomial theorem is stated as k=0nq(k+12)nkqxk=(x;q)n=k=1n(1+xqk), and Rothe’s formula is given by k=0n(1)kq(k2)nkqxk=(x;q)n=k=0n1(1xqk), see [1].

Now we recall some well-known results about the sums involving Fibonomial coefficients from the current literature. These sums are computed explicitly by writing everything in terms of q and using the Cauchy binomial theorem and Rothe’s formula.

In [10-16], the authors consider some Fibonomial sums with weights generalized Fibonacci and Lucas numbers.

In [11], some variations of qDixon identity which have results in terms of Fibonomial sums are examined.

In [12,18,14,13], the authors are interested in the sums with terms finite products of generalized Fibonacci and Lucas numbers and squares of Fibonomial coefficients. An example can be given as

k=02n+1(1)kqk22kn3k(1q2k)22n+1kq2=2(1)n+1qn22n2(1+q)(1q2n+1)21+q2n2n+1nq2.

They give a systematic approach to evaluate these kinds of sums. In [15], sums with a new kind of coefficients are examined. They consider the coefficients as products of two Gaussian qbinomial coefficients with a parametric rational weight function. Also some applications to Fibonomial sums are given. To compute these sums, the partial fraction decomposition technique is used.

In [18], a class of sums of triple aerated Fibonomial coefficients with generalized Fibonacci number coefficients are studied.

In [3], quadratic sums of Gaussian qbinomial coefficients with two additional parameters are evaluated. These results include various known results on square sums of the Gaussian qbinomial coefficients when the parameters are specialized.

In [9,21,22,23,24], various weighted Fibinomial sums are calculated.

In [19,20], various divisibility properties of Fibonomial coefficients are considered.

In this paper, we will usually deal with the following types of sums: kam,n,kan+bkU,m,k(1)kam,n,kan+bkU,m,andk(1)kam,n,n2,k,k2an+bkU,m, where a,b are integers. The first of the above sums will be called as on-line weighted, the second is called as on-line alternate weighted and the third is called as non-line alternate weighted sum. In particular, a generalized version of the sum of the third type will be given for the first time in the literature.

In the paper, inspired by some of the previous results and earlier partial q binomial sums formulæ, we shall derive some interesting new kinds of generalized Fibonomial sums with generalized Fibonacci and Lucas numbers weighted. We compute these sums by using Cauchy binomial theorem or Rothe’s formula after converting them into forms involving the Gaussian q binomial coefficients. These steps can be seen by the following diagram: kam,n,kan+bkU,m%Convert to qformkam,n,k(q)an+bkqm↖↙f(m,n,q)Obtained closed form

To summarize, we will present the following situations in this paper:

  • Sums of the Gaussian qbinomial coefficients.

  • Partial sums of the Gaussian qbinomial coefficients.

  • New weighted sums containing square subscripts of generalized Fibonacci and Lucas numbers which will be given for the first time in this paper.

  • New weighted sums of the generalized Fibonomial coefficients.

  • New qidentities for readers’ convenience.

2. Sums: with the exact closed forms

We give our main results in this section. We find identities of several sums. To prove the identities, the technique is to translate everything in terms of a variable q, and then to use Rothe’s identity and Cauchy Binomial theorem from classical qcalculus.

2.1. Non-line weighted sums

We first consider the sums with non-line weighted. The following theorem gives some identities in this kind.

Theorem 2.1. Let n and m be nonnegative integers. Then we have

  • For n is odd k=02n(1)k2nkU,mUm(kn)2=2(p2+4)n12k=1nUm(2k1), and for n is even k=02n(1)k2nkU,mVm(kn)2=2(p2+4)n2k=1nUm(2k1).

  • k=04n(1)k4nkUV(2nk)2=2(p2+4)nU8n2U4n1k=12n2U2k+1.

  • k=04n(1)k4nkUU(2nk)2=0.

  • k=04n+2(1)k4n+2kUV(2n+1k)2=0.

  • For n is odd, k=02n(1)k2nkU,mVm(k22nk)=2(p2+4)n+12(1)(m+1)Umn2k=1nUm(2k1), and for n is even, k=02n(1)k2nkU,mVm(k22nk)=(p2+4)n2Vmn2k=1nUm(2k1).

  • Let m be an even integer. Then k=02n(1)k2nkU,mUm(k22nk)=(p2+4)n12Vmn2k=1nUm(2k1), for n is odd, and k=02n(1)k2nkU,mUm(k22nk)=(p2+4)n2Umn2k=1nUm(2k1), for n is even.

  • Let m be an odd integer. Then k=02n(1)k2nkU,mUm(k22nk)=(p2+4)n12Vmn2k=1nUm(2k1), for n is odd, and k=02n(1)k2nkU,mUm(k22nk)=(p2+4)n2Umn2k=1nUm(2k1), for n is even.

Proof. We will give the proof of the identity (i). Other identities can be similarly shown. To prove this, we use Gauss identity given in (1). Replacing q by α/β, we find that (1) reduces to (2)k=02n(1)k2nkU,mβm(kn)2=(1)n(αβ)nk=1nUm(2k1).

Similarly if q is replaced by β/α, we obtain (3)k=02n(1)k2nkU,mαm(kn)2=(1)n(βα)nk=1nUm(2k1).

If n is odd, we subtract (2) from (3) to get k=02n(1)k2nkU,mUm(kn)2=2(p2+4)n12k=1nUm(2k1), and if n is even, we add (2) to (3) to get k=02n(1)k2nkU,mVm(kn)2=2(p2+4)n2k=1nUm(2k1).

This completes the proof. ◻

We obtain the following results given by L. Carlitz in “The Fibonacci Quarterly, Advanced problems and solutions, 10(6)(1972), page 630, problem H-202″.

Corollary 2.2. For k is odd, j=02k(1)j2kjF(jk)2=25k12j=1kF2j1, and for k is even, j=02k(1)j2kjL(jk)2=25k2j=1kF2j1.

2.2. On-line weighted sums

Now, we will derive some identities for on-line weighted sums.

Theorem 2.3. Let n and m be nonnegative integers. Then we have

(i)

k=02n2nkU,mUmk={2U2mnk=1n1Vmk2,m iseven,2U2mnk=1n1V2mk,m is odd.

(ii)

k=02n2nkU,mU(2n1)mk={2Umn(2n1)2Vmn(2n1)2k=12n1Vmk,m is even,2k=0n2n12k1U,mU(4k2)mn,m is odd.

(iii)

k=02n2nkU,mVmk={k=1nVmk2,m is even,k=1nV2mk,m is odd.

(iv)

k=02n(1)k2nkU,mU(2n1)mk={0,m is even,2k=0n12n12kU,mU4nmk,m is odd.

(v)

k=02n(1)k2nkU,mVmk={0,m is even,4k=1n1V2mk,m is odd.

Proof. In order to keep this paper within reasonable length, we restricted ourselves to a short selection. Thus we will only prove the first identity of Theorem 2.3. All the other verifications are very similar. To prove the first identity, we first translate everything into qform. We see that the identity k=02n2nkU,mUmk={2U2mnk=1n1Vmk2,m is even,2U2mnk=1n1V2mk,m is odd, will be k=02n(1qmk)(1)mk(2nk+1)2qmk(2nk+1)22nkqm={2(1q2mn)qm(n+12)(qm;qm)n12,m is even,2(qm)(n+12)(1q2mn)(q2m;q2m)n1,m is odd.

So we will prove this qform. First we separate the sum into two sums, that is k=02n(1qmk)(1)mk(2nk+1)2qmk(2nk+1)22nkqm=k=02n(1)mk(2nk+1)2qmk(k2n1)22nkqmk=02n(1)mk(2nk+1)2qmk(k2n+1)22nkqm.

Let m be even. Then

k=02n(1)mk(2nk+1)2qmk(k2n1)22nkqmk=02n(1)mk(2nk+1)2qmk(k2n+1)22nkqm=k=02nqmk(k2n1)22nkqmk=02nqmk(k2n+1)22nkqm=L1L2.

Here L1=k=02nqmk(k2n1)22nkqm=k=02nqm(k+12)qmk(n+1)2nkqm and L2=k=02nqmk(k2n+1)22nkqm. By Cauchy binomial theorem we can write L1=k=02nqm(k+12)qmk(n+1)2nkqm=k=12n(1+qm(kn1))=2(1+qmn)k=1n1(1+qmk)(1+qmk)=2(1+qmn)k=1n1qmk(1+qmk)2=2(1+qmn)qm(n2)(qm;qm)n12, and L2=k=02nqmk(k2n+1)22nkqm=k=02nqm(k+12)qmnk2nkqm=k=12n(1+qm(kn))=2(1+qmn)k=1n1(1+qmk)(1+qmk)=2(1+qmn)k=1n1qmk(1+qmk)2=2(1+qmn)qm(n2)(qm;qm)n12.

Hence for m is even, we get

L1L2=2(1+qmn)qm(n2)(qm;qm)n122(1+qmn)qm(n2)(qm;qm)n12=2(1q2mn)qm(n+12)(qm;qm)n12.

Now let m be odd. Then the sum will separate into two sums as follows k=02nik2qm(k+12)qm(n+1)ki(2n+1)k2nkqmk=02nik2qm(k+12)qmnki(2n+1)k2nkqm=S1S2. So we will find the sums S1 and S2. Now S1=k=02nik2i(2n+1)kqm(k+12)qm(n+1)k(2nk)qm=1+i2k=02nqm(k+12)(i(2n+1)qm(n+1))k(2nk)qm+1i2k=02nqm(k+12)(i(2n+1)qm(n+1))k(2nk)qm=1+i2k=12n(1+i(2n+1)qm(kn1))+1i2k=12n(1i(2n+1)qm(kn1))=in2(1+i(2n+1)qmn)k=1n1i(2n+1)qmk(1+q2mk)+i3n2(1i(2n+1)qmn)k=1n1i(2n+1)qmk(1+q2mk)=in2+n+1(1+i(2n+1)qmn)qm(n2)(q2m;q2m)n1+in2+3n1(1i(2n+1)qmn)qm(n2)(q2m;q2m)n1=in2+n+1qm(n2)(q2m;q2m)n1×[(1+i(2n+1)qmn)(1i(2n+1)qmn)]=2(1)(n+12)qm(n2)qmn(q2m;q2m)n1. and S2=k=02nik2qm(k+12)qmnki(2n+1)k(2nk)qm=1+i2k=02nqm(k+12)qmnki(2n+1)k(2nk)qm+1i2k=02nqm(k+12)qmnki(2n+1)k(2nk)qm=1+i2k=12n(1+i(2n+1)qm(kn))+1i2k=12n(1i(2n+1)qm(kn))=in2(1+i(2n+1)qmn)k=1n1i(2n+1)qmk(1+q2mk)+i3n2(1i(2n+1)qmn)k=1n1i(2n+1)qmk(1+q2mk)=in2+n+1(1+i(2n+1)qmn)qm(n2)(q2m;q2m)n1+in2+3n1(1i(2n+1)qmn)qm(n2)(q2m;q2m)n1=in2+n+1qm(n2)(q2m;q2m)n1×[(1+i(2n+1)qmn)(1i(2n+1)qmn)]=2(1)(n+12)qm(n2)qmn(q2m;q2m)n1. Therefore the sum that we want to evaluate will be S1S2=2(1)(n+12)qm(n2)qmn(q2m;q2m)n12(1)(n+12)qm(n2)qmn(q2m;q2m)n1=2(1)(n+12)qm(n2)(q2m;q2m)n1(qmnqmn)=2(qm)(n+12)(1q2mn)(q2m;q2m)n1. Hence the proof is completed. ◻

Theorem 2.4. Let n and m be nonnegative integers. Then

  • k=02n+12n+1kU,mU2mk={2Um(2n+1)k=1n1Vmn+2kk=1n1V2mk2,m is even,2Um(2n+1)Vm(2n+1)k=1n1V2mk,m is odd.

  • k=02n+12n+1kU,mU2nmk={2Um(2n+1)2Vm(2n+1)2k=12n+1Vmk,m is even,2k=0n2n2kU,mU(2n+1)2mk,m is odd.

  • k=02n+12n+1kU,mV2mk={2Vm(2n+1)k=01Vmn+mkk=1n1Vmk2,m is even,2(p2+4)Vm(2n+1)2k=1n1V2mk,m is odd.% 

  • k=02n+1(1)k2n+1kU,mU2nmk={0,m is even,2k=1n2n2k1U,mUm(2n+1)(2k1),m is odd.

  • k=02n+1(1)k2n+1kU,mV2mk={0,m is even,2VmVm(2n+1)k=1n1V2mk,m is odd.

Proof. We will only prove the fifth identity of Theorem 2.4. All the other verifications are very similar. Again we translate everything into qform. Then we observe that k=02n+1(1)k2n+1kU,mV2mk={0,m is even,2VmVm(2n+1)k=1n1V2mk,m isodd, can be written in qform as k=02n+1(1)k(q)mk(2nk+3)2(1+q2mk)2n+1kqm={0,m is even,2in2+nqm(n2)qm(n+1)(1+qm)(1+qm(2n+1))(q2m;q2m)n1,m is odd. Let m be even. Then k=02n+1(1)k(q)mk(2nk+3)2(1+q2mk)2n+1kqm=k=02n+1(1)kqm(k2)(q)mk(n+1)imk(1k)2n+1kqm+k=02n+1(1)kqm(k2)(q)mk(n+1)imk(1k)q2mk2n+1kqm=k=02n+1(1)kqm(k2)qmk(n+1)2n+1kqm+k=02n+1(1)kqm(k2)qmk(1n)2n+1kqm=k=02n(1qm(kn1))+k=02n(1qm(k+1n))=0. Now let m be odd. Then we have k=02n+1(1)k(q)mk(2nk+3)2(1+q2mk)2n+1kqm=k=02n+1(1)kqm(k2)(q)mk(n+1)imk(1k)2n+1kqm+k=02n+1(1)kqm(k2)(q)mk(n+1)imk(1k)q2mk2n+1kqm=k=02n+1(1)kik2qm(k2)(i2n+1qm(n+1))k2n+1kqm+k=02n+1(1)kik2qm(k2)(i2n+1qm(1n))k2n+1kqm=S1+S2. Here S1=k=02n+1(1)kik2qm(k2)(i2n+1qm(n+1))k2n+1kqm=1+i2k=02n+1(1)kqm(k2)(i2n+1qm(n+1))k2n+1kqm+1i2k=02n+1(1)kqm(k2)(i2n+1qm(n+1))k2n+1kqm=1+i2k=02n(1i2n+1qm(kn1))+1i2k=02n(1+i2n+1qm(kn1))=in2(1i2n+1qmn)(1i2n+1qm(n+1))×k=1n1i2n+1qmk(1+q2mk)+i3n2(1+i2n+1qmn)(1+i2n+1qm(n+1))×k=1n1i2n+1qmk(1+q2mk)=2in2+nqm(n2)qmn(1+qm)(q2m;q2m)n1 and S2=k=02n+1(1)kik2qm(k2)(i2n+1qm(1n))k2n+1kqm=1+i2k=02n+1(1)kqm(k2)(i2n+1qm(1n))k2n+1kqm+1i2k=02n+1(1)kqm(k2)(i2n+1qm(1n))k2n+1kqm=1+i2k=02n(1i2n+1qm(kn+1))+1i2k=02n(1+i2n+1qm(kn+1))=in2(1i2n+1qmn)(1i2n+1qm(n+1))k=1n1i2n+1qmk(1+q2mk)+i3n2(1+i2n+1qmn)(1+i2n+1qm(n+1))×k=1n1i2n+1qmk(1+q2mk)=2in2+nqm(n2)qmn(1+qm)(q2m;q2m)n1.

Thus the result follows as S1+S2=2in2+nqm(n2)qmn(1+qm)(q2m;q2m)n1+2in2+nqm(n2)qmn(1+qm)(q2m;q2m)n1 =2in2+nqm(n2)[qmn+qm(n+1)+qmn+qm(n+1)](q2m;q2m)n1. ◻

3. Outlines: other identities in qform

We give here the complete list of qbinomial versions of the identities given in Section 2. Let n and m be both nonnegative integers. Identities given in Theorem 2.3 can be converted into qforms as follows:

Identity (ii) can be converted as

k=02n(q)mk(4nk1)2(1qmk(2n1))2nkqm={2(q)mn(2n1)2(1qmn(2n1))k=12n1(q)mk2(1+qmk),m is even,% 2k=0n(q)m(2k1)(2nk)(1qmn(4k2))2n12k1qm,m is odd. Identity (iii) can be converted as k=02n(q)mk(2nk+1)2(1+qmk)2nkqm={k=1nqmk(1+qmk)2,m iseven,k=1n(1)kqmk(1+q2mk),m is odd. Identity (iv) can be converted as k=02n(1)k(q)mk(4nk1)2(1qmk(2n1))2nkqm. The sum equals 0 for m is even. Otherwise, we have 2k=0n1(q)mk(4n2k1)(1q4mnk)2n12kqm. Identity (v) can be converted as k=02n(1)k(q)mk(2nk+1)2(1+qmk)2nkqm={0,m is even,4k=1n1(1)kqmk(1+q2mk),m is odd. Identities given in Theorem 2.4 can be converted into q forms as follows:

Identity (i) can be converted as k=02n+1(q)2kmn+3kmmk22(1q2mk)2n+1kqm. If m is even, we have

2(q)m(2n+1)2(1qm(2n+1))k=1n1(q)mn+2k2(1+qmn+2k)k=1n1q2mk(1+q2mk)2, and if m is odd 2(q)m(2n+1)(1q2m(2n+1))k=1n1(q)mk(1+q2mk). Identity (ii) can be converted as k=02n+1(q)mk(4nk+1)2(1q2mnk)2n+1kqm={2(q)m(2n+1)2(1qm(2n+1))k=12n+1(q)mk2(1+qmk),m is even,% 2k=0n(q)mk(4n2k+1)(1q2mk(2n+1))2n2kqm,m is odd. Identity (iii) can be converted as k=02n+1(q)mk(2n+3k)2(1+q2mk)2n+1kqm. If m is even we have 2q(2mn+m)(1+qmn)(1+qm(n+1))(1+qm(2n+1))k=1n1qmk(1+qmk)2, and if m is odd 2(p2+4)qm(2n+1)(1+qm(2n+1))2k=1n1(q)mk(1+q2mk). Identity (iv) can be converted as k=02n+1(1)kqmk(4n+1k)2(1q2nmk)2n+1kqm. The sum equals 0 for m is even. Otherwise, we have

2k=1n(q)m(2k1)(2nk+1)(1qm(2n+1)(2k1))2n2k1qm.

4. Conclusion

In this paper we considered some sums which are called as on-line and non-line and we obtained some identities in qform. For special qvalues we obtain some Fibonomial sums identities and these results can be proved by using qZeilberger algorithm in Mathematica or Mapple program versions. Furthermore, sums with negative subscripts can be also considered in future studies. Our starting point for this case will be the following identity. The identity k=1n(1)k(k+1)2αkknnkF=1, is obtained by using the identity k=1n(1)k1qk(k1)2nkq=1. So some results can also be obtained similar to this sum.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the referees for their valuable comments which helped to improve the paper.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References:

  1. G. E. Andrews, R. Askey, and R. Roy. Special Functions. Cambridge University Press, 1999.
  2. L. Carlitz. The characteristic polynomial of a certain matrix of binomial coefficients. The Fibonacci Quarterly, 3(2):81–89, 1965.
  3. W. Chu and E. Kılç. Quadratic sums of Gaussian q-binomial coefficients and Fibonacci binomial coefficients. Ramanujan Journal, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11139-018-0023-x.
  4. S. Falcon. On the k-Lucas numbers. International Journal of Contemporary Mathematics Sciences, 6(21):1039–1050, 2011.
  5. S. Falcon and A. Plaza. On the Fibonacci k-numbers. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 32:1615–1624, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2006.09.022.
  6. D. Jarden. Recurring sequences. Mathematics Student, 16:28–30, 1949.
  7. E. Kılç. The generalized Fibonacci matrix. European Journal of Combinatorics, 31(1):193–209, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejc.2009.03.041.
  8. E. Kılç. Evaluation of sums containing triple aerated generalized Fibonacci binomial coefficients. Mathematica Slovaca, 67(2):355–370, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1515/ms-2016-0272.
  9. E. Kılç and I. Akkus. On Fibonacci binomial sums identities with special sign functions: analytically q-calculus approach. Mathematica Slovaca, 68(3):501–512, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1515/ms-2017-0120.
  10. E. Kılç, I. Akkus, and H. Ohtsuka. Some generalized Fibonacci binomial sums related with the Gaussian q-binomial sums. Bulletin Mathématique de la Société des Sciences Mathématiques de Roumanie, 55(103):51–61, 2012.
  11. E. Kılç and H. Prodinger. Formula related to the q-Dixon formula with applications to Fibonacci binomial sums. Periodica Mathematica Hungarica, 70(2):216–226, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10998-014-0069-5.
  12. E. Kılç and H. Prodinger. Closed form evaluation of restricted sums containing squares of Fibonacci binomial coefficients. U.P.B. Scientific Bulletin, Series A, 78(4):57–66, 2016.
  13. E. Kılç and H. Prodinger. Closed form evaluation of sums containing squares of Fibonacci binomial coefficients. Mathematica Slovaca, 66(3):757–765, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1515/ms-2015-0177.
  14. E. Kılç and H. Prodinger. Evaluation of sums involving Gaussian q-binomial coefficients with rational weight functions. International Journal of Number Theory, 12(2):495–504, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793042116500305.
  15. E. Kılç and H. Prodinger. Evaluation of sums involving products of Gaussian q-binomial coefficients with applications to Fibonacci binomial sums. Turkish Journal of Mathematics, 41(3):707–716, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3906/mat-1611-64.
  16. E. Kılç, H. Prodinger, I. Akkus, and H. Ohtsuka. Formulas for Fibonacci sums with generalized Fibonacci and Lucas coefficients. The Fibonacci Quarterly, 49(4):320–329, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1080/00150517.2011.12428031.
  17. E. Kılç, G. N. Stănică, and P. Stănică. Spectral properties of some combinatorial matrices. Congressus Numerantium, 201:223–235, 2010.
  18. E. Kılç and A. Yalçıner. On sums of squares of Fibonacci coefficients by q-calculus. Asian-European Journal of Mathematics, 9(3):1650023, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793557116500238.
  19. D. Marques, J. Sellers, and P. Trojovský. On divisibility properties of certain Fibonacci coefficients by a prime. The Fibonacci Quarterly, 51(1):78–83, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1080/00150517.2013.12427974.
  20. D. Marques and P. Trojovský. On divisibility of Fibonacci coefficients by 3. Journal of Integer Sequences, 15:1–10, 2012. Article 12.6.4.
  21. D. Marques and P. Trojovský. On some new sums of Fibonacci coefficients. The Fibonacci Quarterly, 50(2):155–162, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1080/00150517.2012.12428010.
  22. D. Marques and P. Trojovský. On some new identities for the Fibonacci coefficients. Mathematica Slovaca, 64(4):809–818, 2014. https://doi.org/10.2478/s12175-014-0241-7.
  23. J. Seibert and P. Trojovský. On some identities for the Fibonacci coefficients. Mathematica Slovaca, 55(1):9–19, 2005.
  24. P. Trojovský. On some identities for the Fibonacci coefficients via generating function. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 155(15):2017–2024, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2007.05.003.