The tFibonacci sequences in some finite groups with center Z(G)=G

M. Hashemi1, M. Pirzadeh1
1Department of Pure Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematical Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran.

Abstract

We consider finitely presented groups Gmn as follows:
Gmn=x,yxm=yn=1,[x,y]x=[x,y],[x,y]y=[x,y]m,n2.
In this paper, we first study the groups Gmn. Then by using the properties of Gmm and tFibonacci sequences in
finitely generated groups, we show that the period of tFibonacci sequences in Gmm are a multiple of K(t,m). In particular for t3 and p=2, we prove LENt(Gpp)=2K(t,p).

Keywords: Fibonacci sequences, tFibonacci sequences, Group

1. Introduction

Fibonacci numbers and their generalizations have many applications in every field of science and art; see for example, [1-3]. Fibonacci numbers Fn are defined by the recurrence relation F0=0,F1=1;Fn=Fn2+Fn1,n2. For any given integer t2, the tstep Fibonacci sequence Fn(t) is defined [4] by the following recurrence formula: Fn(t)=Fn1(t)+Fn2(t)++Fnt(t), with initial conditions F0(t)=0,F1(t)=0,,Ft2(t)=0 and Ft1(t)=1. For m2, we consider Fn(t,m)=Fn(t) (mod m). Following Wall [5] one may also prove that Fn(t,m) is periodic sequences. We use K(t,m) to denote the minimal length of the period of the sequence Fn(t,m) and call it Wall number of m with respect to tstep Fibonacci sequence. For example, for {Fn(4)}n=0n=={0,0,0,1,1,2,4,8,15,29,}, by considering {Fn(4)mod2}n=0n=={0,0,0,1,1,0_,0,0,1,1,}, we get K(4,2)=5.

The Fibonacci sequences in finite groups have been studied by many authors; see for example, [6-11]. We now introduce a generalization of Fibonacci sequences in finite groups which first presented in [4] by Knox.

Definition 1. Let jt. A tFibonacci sequence in a finite group is a sequence of group elements x1,x2,,xn, for which, given an initial set {x1,x2,,xj}, each element is defined by xn={x1x2 xn1,j<nt,xnt xnt+1 xn1, n>t.

Note that the initial elements x1,x2,,xj, generate the group. The tFibonacci sequence of G with seed in X={x1,x2,,xj} is denoted by Ft(G;X) and its period is denoted by LENt(G;X) (see [7,12]). When it is clear which generating set is being investigated, we will write LENt(G) for LENt(G;X).

Now, we consider Gm=Gmm=x,y|xm=ym=1,[x,y]x=[x,y],[x,y]y=[x,y]  m2. For every t3, to study the tFibonacci sequences of Gm, we define the sequence {gn(t)}0 of numbers as follows: g0(3)=g1(3)=g2(3)=g3(3)=0,g4(3)=1,g5(3)=6;gn(3)=gn3(3)+gn2(3)+gn1(3)+(Fn3(3))(Fn1(3)Fn2(3))+(Fn3(3)+Fn2(3))(Fn(3)Fn1(3))g0(t)=g1(t)=g2(t)=0,g3(t)=g3(t1),,gt+1(t)=gt+1(t1);gn(t)=gnt(t)+gnt+1(t)+gnt+2(t)++gn1(t)+Fn3(t)(Fn1(t)Fn2(t))+(Fn3(t)+Fn2(t))(Fn(t)Fn1(t))+(Fn3(t)+Fn2(t)+Fn1(t))(Fn+1(t)Fn(t))+(Fn3(t)+Fn2(t)+Fn1(t)+Fn(t))(Fn+2(t)Fn+1(t))   +(Fn3(t)++Fn+t5(t))(Fn+t3(t)Fn+t4(t)); n>t+1,t4.

The 2Fibonacci length and 3Fibonacci length of Gm were investigated in [8,12]. In this paper, we study the tFibonacci sequence of Gm. Section 2 is devoted to the proofs of some preliminary results that are needed for the main results of this paper. In Section 3, we generalize 3Fibonacci sequences idea to tFibonacci sequences (t4). Also, we prove the Theorem 3, which show that for every t3 and p=2, LENt(Gp)=2K(t,p).

2. Some Preliminaries

The aim of this section is to collect several facts and basic results that will be used in the rest of this paper. First for given integers m2 and t4, let Fi=Fi(t,m),K(m)=K(t,m) then we prove the following results:

Lemma 1. For integers n,i and m with m2, we have

  1. FK(m)+iFi(mod m),

  2. FnK(m)+iFi(mod m).

Proof. Using of the definition of the Wall number of the tstep Fibonacci sequence one has: FK(m)+iFi(mod m). To prove (ii), according to the above relations, we have
FnK(m)+iFK(m)+((n1)K(m)+i)F(n1)K(m)+iFi(mod m). ◻

Corollary 1. For integers n and m2, if {Fn0  (mod m),  Fn+t2 0   (mod m),Fn+t1 1   (mod m). Then K(m)|n.

Proof. Let n=aK(m)+i, 0i<K(m). Then by Lemma 1, we get {Fi0  (mod m),  Fi+t2 0   (mod m),Fi+t1 1   (mod m). Now, since K(m) is the least integer such that the assumption holds, the proof is completed immediately. ◻

We need some results concerning the groups presented by Gmn=x,y|xm=yn=1,[x,y]x=[x,y],[x,y]y=[x,y]     m,n2. First, we state a Lemma without proof that establishes some properties of groups of nilpotency class two.

Lemma 2. If G is a group and GZ(G), then the following hold for every integer k and u,v,wG

  1. [uv,w]=[u,w][v,w] and [u,vw]=[u,v][u,w],

  2. [uk,v]=[u,vk]=[u,v]k,

  3. (uv)k=ukvk[v,u]k(k1)2.

Lemma 3. Let m,n be positive integer numbers and d=g.c.d(m,n). Then |Gmn|=d×mn.

Proof. Consider the subgroup H=a,[a,b] of Gmn. Obviously H is abelian and a simple coset enumeration by defining n coset as 1=H and ib=i+1,1in1 shows that |G:H|=n. Using the modified Todd-coxeter coset enumeration algorithm, yields the following presentation for H: H=h1,h2|h1m=h2m=h1n=h2n=1,[h1,h2]=1. So that HZm×Zd and |Gmn|=|G:H|×|H|=d×mn◻

The following proposition is of interest to consider and one may see the proof in [8].

Proposition 1. Let G=Gmn. Then

  1. G=[a,b].

  2. Every element of G is in the form xiyjg where 0im1,0jn1 and gG.

  3. Z(G)=x,y,z|xm/d=yn/d=zd=[x,y]=[x,z]=[y,z]=1.

For the particular case, consider m=n then for m2 we get Gm=Gmm=x,y|xm=ym=1,[x,y]x=[x,y],[x,y]y=[x,y].

Corollary 2. With the above facts, we have

  1. |Gm|=m3,Z(Gm)=Gm,|Z(Gm)|=m.

  2. Every element of Gm can be written uniquely in the form xrys[y,x]t where 0r,s,tm1.

3. The tFibonacci Sequences of Gm

In this section, we examine the tFibonacci sequence of Gm with respect to the ordered generating set X={x,y}. First, we show that every element of F4(Gm;X) has a standard form.

Lemma 4. For every n,(n3) every element xn of the 4Fibonacci sequences of group Gm can be written in the form xFn+2Fn+1yFn+1[y,x]gn.

Proof. Let xr=xr(4), Fr=Fr(4) and gr=gr(4). We proceed by induction on n, for n=3,4 we have

x3=x1x2=xy[y,x]0=xF5F4yF4[y,x]g3

x4=x1x2x3=x2y2[y,x]=xF6F5yF5[y,x]g4
and if xk=xFk+2Fk+1yFk+1[y,x]gk (4kn1), then by the relation xn=xn4xn3xn2xn1 we get xn=xn4 xn3 xn2 xn1=xFn2Fn3yFn3[y,x]gn4xFn1Fn2yFn2[y,x]gn3×xFnFn1yFn1[x,y]gn2 xFn+1FnyFn[y,x]gn1=xFn1Fn3yFn3+Fn2[y,x]gn4+gn3+Fn3(Fn1Fn2)xFnFn1yFn1×[y,x]gn2xFn+1FnyFn[y,x]gn1=xFnFn3yFn3+Fn2+Fn1×[y,x]gn4+gn3+gn2+Fn3(Fn1Fn2)+(Fn3+Fn2)(FnFn1)×xFn+1FnyFn[y,x]gn1=xFn+1Fn3yFn3+Fn2+Fn1+Fn×[y,x]gn4+gn3+gn2+gn1+Fn3(Fn1Fn2)+(Fn3+Fn2)(FnFn1)×[y,x](Fn3+Fn2+Fn1)(Fn+1Fn)=xFn+2Fn+1yFn+1[y,x]gn. Thus the assertion holds. ◻

Now, we are ready to generalize the idea of 4Fibonacci sequence of Gm to tFibonacci sequence of these groups.

Theorem 1. For every t4 and n3, each element xn of the tFibonacci sequences of group Gm can be written in the form xn(t)=xFn+t2(t)Fn+t3(t)yFn+t3(t)[y,x]gn(t).

Proof. Use an induction method on t. We have for t=4: xn(4)=xFn+2(4)Fn+1(4)yFn+1(4)[y,x]gn(4) and if for every k, (5kt), we have xn(k)=xFn+2(k)Fn+1(k)yFn+1(k)[y,x]gn(k). It is sufficient to show that xn(t+1)=xFn+t1(t+1)Fn+t2(t+1)yFn+t2(t+1)[y,x]gn(t+1). For this, we use an induction method on n:
If 3st, by definitions of Fn and gn we get Fs(t+1)=Fs(t) and gs(t+1)=gs(t), then xs(t+1)=xs(t). By this and the inductive hypothesis t we have xs(t+1)=xFs+t1(t+1)Fs+t2(t+1)yFs+t2(t+1)[y,x]gs(t+1). Now we suppose that the hypothesis of induction holds for all sn1. By definition of xn(t+1) and Corollary 2-(ii), we get; xn(t+1)=xn(t+1)(t+1)xn(t+1)+1(t+1)××xn1(t+1)=xFn2(t+1)Fn3(t+1) yFn3(t+1)[y,x]gnt1(t+1)×xFn1(t+1)Fn2(t+1)yFn2(t+1)[y,x]gnt(t+1)×xFn(t+1)Fn1(t+1) yFn1(t+1)[y,x]gnt+1(t+1)××xFn+t2(t+1)Fn+t3(t+1) yFn+t3(t+1)[y,x]gn1(t+1)=xFn1(t+1)Fn3(t+1) yFn3(t+1)+Fn2(t+1)×[y,x]gnt1(t+1)+gnt(t+1)+Fn3(t+1)(Fn1(t+1)Fn2(t+1))×xFn(t+1)Fn1(t+1) yFn1(t+1)[y,x]gnt+1(t+1)××xFn+t2(t+1)Fn+t3(t+1)yFn+t3(t+1)[y,x]gn1(t+1)=xFn(t+1)Fn3(t+1) yFn3(t+1)+Fn2(t+1)+Fn1(t+1)×[y,x]gnt1(t+1)+gnt(t+1)+gnt+1(t+1)×[y,x]Fn3(t+1)((Fn1(t+1)Fn2(t+1))×[y,x](Fn3(t+1)+Fn2(t+1))(Fn(t+1)Fn1(t+1))××xFn+t2(t+1)Fn+t3(t+1) yFn+t3(t+1)[y,x]gn1(t+1). We continue this process and find that xn(t+1)=xFn+t1(t+1)Fn+t2(t+1)yFn3(t+1)++Fn+t3(t+1)×[y,x]gnt1(t+1)++gn1(t+1)+Fn3(t+1)(Fn1(t+1)Fn2(t+1))×[y,x](Fn3(t+1)+Fn2(t+1))(Fn(t+1)Fn1(t+1))×[y,x](Fn3(t+1)++Fn+t4(t+1))(Fn+t2(t+1)Fn+t3(t+1))=xFn+t1(t+1)Fn+t2(t+1)yFn+t2(t+1)[y,x]gn(t+1). The theorem is proved. ◻

Example 1. For integer m=2, by using above Theorem and relations of Gm, we obtain the 4Fibonacci sequence of Gm (i.e.F4(Gm;X)) as follows: x1=x,x2=y,x3=xF5F4yF4[y,x]g3=x3y=xy,x4=xF6F5yF5[y,x]g4=x2y2[y,x]=[y,x],x5=xF7F6yF6[y,x]g5=x4y4[y,x]6=e,x6=xF8F7yF7[y,x]g6=x7y8[y,x]28=x,x7=x14y15[y,x]98=y,x8=x27y29[y,x]379=yx,x9=x52y56[y,x]1436=e,x10=x100y108[y,x]5378=e,x11=x193y208[y,x]19984=x,x12=x372y401[y,x]74434=y,x13=x717y773[y,x]276868=xy,x14=x1382y1490[y,x]1029149=[y,x], Consequently x11=x10+1=x=x1,x12=x10+2=y=x2,x13=x10+3=xy=x3,x14=x10+4=[y,x]=x4. Then LEN4(Gm)=10=2K(4,2).

Theorem 2. If LENt(Gm;X)=P then the equations {FP0  (mod m),    FP+t2 0   (mod m),FP+t1 1   (mod m). hold. Moreover, K(t,m) divides P.

Proof. For a constant t, let and . Since , for 1it, we have xP+i=xi. Then by the Theorem 1 and Corollary 2-(ii), we obtain {FP+t2 Ft2 (mod m),FP+t1 Ft1 (mod m),     FP+t+t3  Ft+t3 (mod m). Now by definition of Fn, this equivalent to {FP+t3 Ft3 (mod m),FP+t2 Ft2 (mod m),     FP+t+t4  Ft+t4 (mod m). By repeating this process, we obtain

{FP0  (mod m),    FP+t2 0   (mod m),FP+t1 1   (mod m). So, the Corollary 1 yields that K(m)|P. ◻

Note. Let G be a finite 2-generated group of nilpotent class two. Then Ga,b|R, where {am=bn=1,[a,b]a=[a,b],[a,b]b=[a,b]}R. By these facts, we believe that the Theorem 2 holds for a finite 2-generated group of nilpotent class two.

A list of K(4,n) for all 2n101 is given in the Table 1.

Table 1.
n K(4,n) n K(4,n) n K(4,n) n K(4,n)
2 5 27 234 52 420 77 6840
3 26 28 1710 53 303480 78 5460
4 10 29 280 54 1170 79 998720
5 312 30 1560 55 1560 80 1560
6 130 31 61568 56 3420 81 702
7 342 32 80 57 89154 82 240
8 20 33 1560 58 280 83 1157520
9 78 34 24560 59 205378 84 22230
10 1560 35 17784 60 1560 85 191568
11 120 36 390 61 226980 86 162800
12 130 37 1368 62 307840 87 3640
13 84 38 34290 63 4446 88 120
14 1710 39 1092 64 160 89 9320
15 312 40 1560 65 2184 90 1560
16 40 41 240 66 1560 91 4788
17 4912 42 22230 67 100254 92 60830
18 390 43 162800 68 24560 93 61568
19 6858 44 120 69 158158 94 519110
20 1560 45 312 70 88920 95 356616
21 4446 46 60830 71 357910 96 1040
22 120 47 103822 72 780 97 368872
23 12166 48 520 73 2664 98 11970
24 260 49 2394 74 6840 99 1560
25 1560 50 1560 75 1560 100 1560
26 420 51 63856 76 34290 101 1030300

In [8], for t=2 and X={x,y}, the tFibonacci length of Gm was studied by H. Doostie and M. Hashemi. They show that for every prime number p LENt(Gp)={2K(t,p),p=2,K(t,p), p2. Note that this formula, may be generalized for n=p1α1psαs; i.e. in this case we have LENt(Gn)=l.c.m{LENt(Gp1α1),,LENt(Gp1αs)}.

Now, we prove the following important theorem which gives an explicit formula for LENt(G2).

Theorem 3. For t3 and p=2, LENt(Gp)=2K(t,p).

Proof. First, we show that K(t,2)=t+1. For any tFibonacci recurrence {Un}n0, we have

(1)Un=Un1+Un2++Unt=Un1+(Un2++Unt1)Unt1=2Un1Unt1, and reduce modulo 2 to get that UnUn(t+1) (mod 2). Let Fn:=Fn(t). Then for {Fn}n0, we already know that F0==Ft2=0, Ft1=1 and clearly Ft=Ft1++F0=1. Thus, modulo 2, {Fn}n0 is simply the repeating block 0,0,,0,1,1, where there are t1 zeros. The above shows right away that FaFa+i0  (mod 2) if i=2,3,,k1 and any a (that is the product of any two members of Fn with indices nonconsecutive but which differ by less than k is zero modulo 2). Now, by the above remark, the recurrence relation for gn(t) and use the fact that xx  (mod 2), we see that

Fn3(Fn1Fn2) Fn3Fn2(mod 2);(Fn3+Fn2)(FnFn1) Fn2Fn1(mod 2);(Fn3+Fn2+Fn1)(Fn+1Fn) Fn1Fn(mod 2);      (Fn3++Fn+t5)(Fn+t3Fn+t4) Fn+t5Fn+t4+Fn+t3Fn+t2(mod 2). The last one deserves an explanation. Indeed, note that by periodicity with period t+1 we have Fn3Fn+t2  (mod 2) and now Fn+t2 and Fn+t3 have consecutive indices. However, this is the only instance when this happens, in all the other relations only the product of the last term from the first (left) factor with the last term from the second (right) factor survive modulo 2. Thus, gn gn1++gnt+(Fn3Fn2++Fn+t5Fn+t4+Fn+t3Fn+t2) (mod 2). The last sum is “almost perfect”. A perfect one would be if Fn+t4Fn+t3 would also be present in the above sum. If it were then this sum would be (2)FmFm+1+Fm+1Fm+2++Fm+tFm+t+1\rm form=n3 and one can check easily that this is constant 1 modulo 2 (it is enough to check it for the first t+1 values of m=0,1,,t and then use periodicity). Since 2Fn+t4Fn+t30(mod2), by the above, we have gngn1++gnt+1+Fn+t4Fn+t3(mod2). Now use the trick at (1). Namely, we have gngn1+(gn2++gnt+gnt1+1+Fn+t5Fn+t4)+gnt1+Fn+t4Fn+t3+Fn+t5Fn+t4(mod2)2gn1+gnt1+Fn+t4(Fn+t3+Fn+t2)(mod2)gnt1+Fn+t4(Fn+t3+Fn+t2)    (mod2). The expression Fn+t4(Fn+t3+Fn+t2) is most times 0 modulo 2 but not always since for n=3 it becomes Ft1(Ft+Ft2)1(mod2). This shows that t+1 is not the period of gn. Well, let’s apply the above relation again with n replaced by nt1. We get gngnt1+Fn+t4(Fn+t3+Fn+t2)(gn(2t+1)+Fn(t+1)+t4(Fn(t+1)+t3+Fn(t+1)+t2))+Fn+t4(Fn+t3+Fn+t2)(mod2), and the expression involving the last four t-Fibonacci numbers is 0. Since Fn is periodic modulo 2 with period t+1 (that is, that last expression is 2Fn+t4(Fn+t3+Fn+t2)0(mod2)). Hence, gngn2(t+1)(mod2), which proves the Theorem. ◻

By using a computer program written in the computational algebra system GAP [13], we checked that the above formula holds for every t=3,4 and 2m10. Some of these results are shown below.

Table 2.
m LEN_3(G_m) K(3,m) LEN_4(G_m) K(4,m)
2 8 4 10 5
3 13 13 26 26
4 16 8 20 10
8 32 16 40 20

At the end of this section we state a conjecture about the LENt(Gp), as follows:
Conjecture. For every t3 and prime number p(p>2) LENt(Gp)=K(t,p).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the referee for the careful reading and the valuable suggestions about the results of this paper.

References:

  1. Caspar, D.L. and Fontano, E., 1996. Five-fold symmetry in crystalline quasicrystal lattices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93(25), pp.14271-14278.
  2. El Naschie, M.S., 2005. Deriving the essential features of the standard model from the general theory of relativity. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 24(4), pp.941-946.
  3. El Naschie, M.S., 2005. Stability analysis of the two-slit experiment with quantum particles. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 26(2), pp.291-294.
  4. Knox, S.W., 1990. Fibonacci sequences in finite groups. Fibonacci Quarterly 30(2), pp.116-120.
  5. Wall, D.D., 1960. Fibonacci series modulo m. The American Mathematical Monthly, 67(6), pp.525-532.
  6. Campbell, C.M. and Campbell, P.P., 2005. The Fibonacci length of certain centro-polyhedral groups. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing, 19, pp.231-240.
  7. Deveci, Ö., Karaduman, E. and Campbell, C.M., 2011, December. On the k-nacci sequences in finite binary polyhedral groups. In Algebra Colloquium (Vol. 18, No. spec01, pp. 945-954). Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and Suzhou University.
  8. Doostie, H. and Hashemi, M., 2006. Fibonacci lengths involving the Wall number k (n). Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing, 20, pp.171-180.
  9. Golamie, R., Doostie, H. and Ahmadidelir, K., 2012. Fibonacci Length and Special Automorphisms of Finite (L, M| N, K)-Groups. twms Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 3(2), Pp.182-189.
  10. Hashemi, M. and Mehraban, E., 2018. On the generalized order 2-Pell sequence of some classes of groups. Communications in Algebra, 46(9), pp.4104-4119.
  11. Hashemi, M. and Pirzadeh, M., 2018. T-Nacci Sequences in Some Special Groups of Order M3. Mahematical Reports, 20(4), pp.389-399.
  12. Hashemi, M. and Mehraban, E., 2015. On The-Nacci Sequences Of Finitely Generated Groups. Menemui Matematik (Discovering Mathematics), 37(1), pp.20-27.
  13. The GAP Group, GAP–Groups, Algorithms, and Programming, Version 4.4.12. http://www.gap-system.org.