We show that connected, bicyclic graphs on nine edges with at least one cycle other than decompose the complete graphs and , for , when the necessary conditions allow for such a decomposition. This complements previous results by Freyberg, Froncek, Jeffries, Jensen, and Sailstad on connected bicyclic triangular graphs.
The decomposition of a graph
is a set of graphs such that for every
edge in there exists exactly one graph , where , such that . If is the complete graph and all graphs are isomorphic to a fixed graph , then we say that there is a -design of . A graph is called bicyclic if it is
a simple graph with exactly two cycles. A graph is connected if for every two vertices
there exists a path
between and . For this paper we will focus only on
-designs of graphs where is a connected bicyclic graph on nine
edges with at least one cycle that is not a 3-cycle, which we may refer
to as non-triangular connected bicyclic graphs. The class of triangular
unicyclic graphs—i.e., graphs with exactly two cycles of length three—
with nine edges was completely characterized for and by Freyberg, Froncek, Jeffries,
Jensen, and Sailstad [1].
Assume is a non-triangular
connected bicyclic graph with nine edges. Because a complete graph has edges, it is apparent that if there is a -design of . This paper considers only -designs of in the cases when .
2. Definitions and Tools
In this section, we introduce the definitions and tools needed to
find the desired decompositions. We begin with the definition of a -labeling:
Definition 1. [2] Given a simple graph with vertex set and edge set where , a -labeling of is a one-to-one function such
that the induced length function where
is a bijection.
For bipartite graphs, we can define a more restrictive (and more
powerful) labeling.
Definition 2. [2] Let
be a bipartite graph with edges
and vertex bipartition and
let be a -labeling of . Then is an -labeling if for all and we have .
The – and -labelings were defined by Rosa
[2] as a means to determine
if or has a -design. The following definition is a
variation of the -labeling for
tripartite graphs.
Definition 3. [3] Let
be a tripartite graph with edges
and vertex tripartition
and let be a -labeling of . Then is a -tripartite labeling of if
for any
edge where ;
for every edge , where and
, there exists an edge , where and , such that ;
for all and , we have .
Notice that this definition can be also used when is empty. In that case, we obtain a
slightly less restrictive version of the -labeling. We do not require all
vertices in to have lower labels
than vertices in , but instead
only whenever is an edge.
We now present definitions of a 1-rotational -labeling and a 1-rotational -tripartite labeling as tools to find
-designs of . By we denote the graph arising
from by deletion of its vertex
.
Definition 4. [4] Let
be a graph on edges. A
1-rotational -labeling
of is a one-to-one function
such that
for some pendant vertex , we have ;
restricted to is a -labeling of .
Definition 5. [4] Let
be a tripartite graph with edges and vertex tripartition . Then a 1-rotational
-tripartite labeling of
is a one-to-one function such that
is a 1-rotational
-labeling of with , where has a degree of one;
if the edge , where , then
;
if , where
and , then there exists an edge , where and , such that .
3. Relevant Theorems
Having defined our means of decomposing and , we now provide theorems to
support the legitimacy of our tools and definitions. The proofs for
these can be found in the provided references.
Theorem 1. [2] Let
be a graph with edges. There
exists a cyclic -decomposition of
if admits a -labeling.
Theorem 2. [2] Let
be a bipartite graph on edges
that admits an -labeling.
Then there exists a cyclic -decomposition of for all .
Theorem 3. [3] Let
be a tripartite graph on edges
that admits a -tripartite
labeling. Then there exists a cyclic -decomposition of for all .
Theorem 4. [4] Let
be a tripartite graph on edges
and a vertex of degree one that admits a 1-rotational -tripartite labeling. Then there
exists a 1-rotational -decomposition of for all .
When partite set (from
Definition 5) is an empty set, then the
following theorem is an easy corollary of the previous one.
Corollary 1. [4] Let
be a bipartite graph on edges and
a vertex of degree one such that
admits an -labeling. Then there exists a
1-rotational -decomposition of
for all .
Using our tools and the theorems that support them, we are now ready
to label our class of graphs to find decompositions of and .
4. Catalog of Graphs and Necessary
Conditions
Here, we catalog all 33 non-isomorphic non-triangular connected
bicyclic graphs with nine edges. Each graph is given a unique name , which defines the -th non-isomorphic graph containing
cycles and connected by a path of length . This notation was previously used
by Froncek and Lee in [5].
The following necessary conditions for existence of the -designs are easy to observe.
Theorem 5. Let be a non-triangular connected bicyclic
graph with nine edges. If there exists a -decomposition of , then . Furthermore, if , then .
Proof. Because our graphs have nine edges, we must have
, which implies . Furthermore, consider
if . When is even, then is odd-regular, and because all
vertices in are even, no -decomposition of can exist with .
5. Graph Labelings
A -tripartite labeling for
each graph can be found in the Appendix. Also, 1-rotational -tripartite labelings for each such
tripartite graph with a pendant edge (i.e., a degree-1 vertex) can be
found along side those -tripartite labelings. For the
bicyclic graphs that are bipartite, we provide -labelings and, for those with a
pendant edge, 1-rotational -labelings where the removal of the
degree-1 vertex results in an
-labeling of the remaining
graph .
Five of the graphs cataloged in Section4 do
not have a pendant edge, two of which were shown in Theorem 5 not to decompose at all. Decompositions of into copies of the other three
graphs without a pendant edge— i.e., , , and —are treated in Section 6.
6. Graphs Without a Pendant Edge
For those graphs that do not have a degree-1 vertex, a 1-rotational
-labeling is not possible. In
this section, we find an alternative approach for settling
decompositions of . Again,
we note that this is only for graphs , , and .
First, we define the following notation for any graphs and and positive integers and : Let denote the graph composed of vertex-disjoint copies of ; whereas, if we write , then the copies of need not be vertex-disjoint, just
edge-disjoint. Let denote
the edge-disjoint union of graphs
and . If is a subgraph of , then we use to denote the subgraph of
with edge set . If and are vertex-disjoint, then we use to denote the join of and , i.e., the graph with vertex set and edge set . We also use to denote the complete multipartite graph with parts of size each. Now, consider the following.
Theorem 6. [6] If is an odd positive integer, then there
exists a .
Corollary 2. There exists a decomposition of
into copies of and for any positive integers
with odd.
For brevity of notation, we now substitute the names , , and for graphs , , and , respectively. When these
graphs have vertex set , then we also use , , and to denote the graphs with edge
sets , , and ,
respectively. For example, if we identify the vertex labels seen in the
Appendix with their vertices, then the -tripartite labelings of , , and shown therein correspond to
, , and ,
respectively.
Example 1. Let and let Then is a -decomposition of , for .
Example 2. Let and let
Then
is a -decomposition of .
Example 3. Let where are the vertices in
the hole. Let
Then is a
-decomposition of , for .
Example 4. Let with
bipartition . Let Then is a -decomposition of .
Example 5. Let with
tripartition . Let Then is a -decomposition of , for .
Example 6. Let with
vertex partition . Let Then is a -decomposition of , for .
Finally, we turn our attention to how the above examples can be used
to settle the missing case for our graphs without a pendant edge.
Theorem 7. If , then there exists a -decomposition of for any .
Proof. If and , then the result follows
from Example 2. If and ,
then the result follows from Examples 1 and 3 and the fact that . We now assume that . Note that . Hence, we need only prove the existence of
-decompositions of and . The former is shown in
Example 3. If , then a -decomposition of follows from the -decomposition of . If , then we note that there
exists a -decomposition
of (by
Corollary 2), and the result follows from
Examples 5 and 6.
7. Main Results
From our constructions and labelings, we reach the following main
results.
Theorem 9. Let be a connected bicyclic graph with
exactly nine edges and at least one cycle that is not a 3-cycle. Then
there exists a -decomposition of
for any .
Proof. For
for any , the proof follows
from Theorems 2 and 3 and the
-labelings and -tripartite labelings given in the
Appendix.
Theorem 9. Let be a connected bicyclic graph with
exactly nine edges and at least one cycle that is not a 3-cycle, except
for and . Then there exists a -decomposition of for any .
Proof. For graphs , and , the result follows from
Theorem 7. For the remaining graphs with a
pendant edge, the proof follows from Theorem 4 and
Corollary 1 along with the 1-rotational -tripartite labelings and
1-rotational -labelings given
in the Appendix.
8. Conclusion
This paper provides a catalog of the 33 non-isomorphic connected
bicyclic graphs on nine edges with at least one cycle that is not a
3-cycle and determines whether or not each decomposes and . It was found that all graphs
decompose and all graphs
except for and decompose . For further research in this
direction, there are many classes of graphs on nine edges that have not
yet been explored. Additionally, the tools used in this paper only apply
to decompositions of and
for , and they do not apply to and . It may be worth further
exploring other graph classes as well as decompositions of these other
complete graphs.
Conflict of
Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References:
Freyberg, B., Froncek, D., Jeffries, J., Jensen, G.
and Sailstad, A., submitted. -designs for the Triangular Bicyclic
Graphs with Nine Edges.
Rosa, A., 1966. On certain valuations of the
vertices of a graph. In Theory of Graphs Internat. Symposium,
Rome (pp. 349-355).
Bunge, R. C., Chantasartrassmee, A., El-Zanati,
S. I. and Vanden Eynden, C., 2013. On cyclic decompositions of complete
graphs into tripartite graphs. Journal of Graph Theory, 72,
pp.90-111.
Bunge, R. C., 2019. On 1-rotational decompositions of complete graphs
into tripartite graphs. Opuscula Mathematica, 39(5),
pp.624–643.
Froncek, D. and Lee, J., 2020. Decomposition of complete graphs in
bi-cyclic graphs with eight edges. Bulletin of the Institute of
Combinatorics and its Applications, 88, pp.30–49.
Abel, R. J. R., Bennett, F. E. and Greig, M., 2007. PBD-Closure. In
C. J. Colbourn & J. H. Dinitz (Eds.), Handbook of Combinatorial
Designs, pp.247-255. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
Appendix
The left column contains the -tripartite labelings for each graph,
and the 1-rotational -tripartite labelings are provided in
the right column, if they exist. The graph vertices are organized into
three rows denoted by , , and ; each row denotes the partite set to
which a vertex belongs. All lengths on edges between vertices in partite
sets and show the positive difference of their
labels (as mentioned in Definition 3, part 2, and in Definition 5, part 3)) in
parentheses.