Utilitas Algorithmica (UA)
ISSN: xxxx-xxxx (print)
Utilitas Algorithmica (UA) is a premier, open-access international journal dedicated to advancing algorithmic research and its applications. Launched to drive innovation in computer science, UA publishes high-impact theoretical and experimental papers addressing real-world computational challenges. The journal underscores the vital role of efficient algorithm design in navigating the growing complexity of modern applications. Spanning domains such as parallel computing, computational geometry, artificial intelligence, and data structures, UA is a leading venue for groundbreaking algorithmic studies.
- Research article
- Full Text
- Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing
- Volume 082
- Pages: 117-130
- Published: 31/08/2012
A group divisible design (GDD) \( (v = v_1 + v_2 + \cdots + v_g, g, k; \lambda_1, \lambda_2) \) is an ordered pair \( (V, \mathcal{B}) \) where \( V \) is a \( v \)-set of symbols and \( \mathcal{B} \) is a collection of \( k \)-subsets (called blocks) of \( V \) satisfying the following properties: the \( v \)-set is divided into \( g \) groups of sizes \( v_1, v_2, \ldots, v_g \); each pair of symbols from the same group occurs in exactly \( \lambda_1 \) blocks in \( \mathcal{B} \); and each pair of symbols from different groups occurs in exactly \( \lambda_2 \) blocks in \( \mathcal{B} \). In this paper we give necessary conditions on \( m \) and \( n \) for the existence of a \( GDD(v = m+n, 2, 3; 1, 2) \), along with sufficient conditions for each \( m \leq \frac{n}{2} \). Furthermore, we introduce some construction techniques to construct some \( GDD(v = m + n, 2, 3; 1, 2) \)s when \( m > \frac{n}{2} \), namely, a \( GDD(v = 9 + 15, 2, 3; 1, 2) \) and a \( GDD(v = 25 + 33, 2, 3; 1, 2) \).
- Research article
- Full Text
- Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing
- Volume 082
- Pages: 105-115
- Published: 31/08/2012
Let \( D \) be a directed graph. An anti-directed cycle in \( D \) is a set of arcs which form a cycle in the underlying graph, but for which no two consecutive arcs form a directed path in \( D \); this cycle is called an anti-directed Hamilton cycle if it includes all vertices of \( D \). Grant [6] first showed that if \( D \) has even order \( n \), and each vertex indegree and outdegree in \( D \) is a bit more than \( \frac{2n}{3} \), then \( D \) must contain an anti-directed Hamilton cycle. More recently, Busch et al. [1] lowered the lead coefficient, by showing that there must be an anti-directed Hamilton cycle if all indegrees and outdegrees are greater than \( \frac{9n}{16} \), and conjectured that such a cycle must exist if all indegrees and outdegrees are greater than \( \frac{n}{2} \). We prove that conjecture holds for all directed graphs of even order less than 20, and are thus able to extend the above result to show that any digraph \( D \) of even order \( n \) will have an anti-directed Hamilton cycle if all indegrees and outdegrees are greater than \( \frac{11n}{20} \).
- Research article
- Full Text
- Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing
- Volume 082, Volume 156
- Pages: 87-103
- Published: 31/08/2012
Let \( G \) be a \((p,q)\)-graph in which the edges are labeled \( k, k+1, \ldots, k+q-1 \), where \( k \geq 0 \). The vertex sum for a vertex \( v \) is the sum of the labels of the incident edges at \( v \). If the vertex sums are constant, modulo \( p \), then \( G \) is said to be \( k \)-edge-magic. In this paper, we investigate some classes of cubic graphs which are \( k \)-edge-magic. We also provide a counterexample to a conjecture that any cubic graph of order \( p \equiv 2 \pmod{4} \) is \( k \)-edge-magic for all \( k \).
- Research article
- Full Text
- Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing
- Volume 082
- Pages: 77-85
- Published: 31/08/2012
In this paper, we obtain a new set of conditions which are necessary for the existence of balanced arrays of strength eight with two levels by making use of the positive semi-definiteness of the matrix of moments. We also demonstrate, using illustrative examples, that the maximum number of constraints derived using these results are better than those obtained earlier.
- Research article
- Full Text
- Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing
- Volume 082
- Pages: 59-75
- Published: 31/08/2012
A set \( D \subseteq V(G) \) is a dominating set of a graph \( G \) if every vertex of \( G \) not in \( D \) is adjacent to at least one vertex in \( D \). A minimum dominating set of \( G \), also called a \( \gamma(G) \)-set, is a dominating set of \( G \) of minimum cardinality. For each vertex \( v \in V(G) \), we define the domination value of \( v \) to be the number of \( \gamma(G) \)-sets to which \( v \) belongs. In this paper, we find the total number of minimum dominating sets and characterize the domination values for \( P_2 \Box P_n \), and \( P_2 \Box C_n \).
- Research article
- Full Text
- Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing
- Volume 082
- Pages: 33-58
- Published: 31/08/2012
Let \( G \) be the one-point union of two cycles and suppose \( G \) has \( n \) edges. We show via various graph labelings that there exists a cyclic \( G \)-decomposition of \( K_{2nt+1} \) for every positive integer \( t \).
- Research article
- Full Text
- Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing
- Volume 082
- Pages: 17-32
- Published: 31/08/2012
Decompositions of complete or near-complete graphs into spanning trees have been widely studied, but usually in the homogeneous case, where all component trees are isomorphic. A spanning tree decomposition \( \mathcal{T} = (T_1, \ldots, T_n) \) of such a graph is purely heterogeneous if no two trees \( T_i \) are isomorphic. We show existence of such decompositions with the maximum degree condition \( \Delta(T_i) = i+1 \) for each \( i \in [1..n] \), for every largest possible graph of odd order, and every even order graph which is the complement of a spanning tree satisfying a necessary maximum degree condition.
- Research article
- Full Text
- Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing
- Volume 082
- Pages: 3-15
- Published: 31/08/2012
Let \( G \) be a simple graph with vertex set \( V(G) \) and edge set \( E(G) \), and let \( \mathbb{Z}_2 = \{0,1\} \). A labeling \( f : V(G) \to \mathbb{Z}_2 \) induces a partial edge labeling \( f^* : E(G) \to \mathbb{Z}_2 \) defined by \( f^*(uv) = f(u) \) if and only if \( f(u) = f(v) \). For \( i \in \mathbb{Z}_2 \), let \( V_f(i) = \{v \in V(G) : f(v) = i\} \) and \( e_f(i) = |\{e \in E(G) : f^*(e) = i\}| \). A labeling \( f \) is called a friendly labeling if \( |V_f(0) – V_f(1)| \leq 1 \). The \( BI(G) \), the balance index set of \( G \), is defined as \( \{|e_f(0) – e_f(1)| : \text{the vertex labeling } f \text{ is friendly}\} \). This paper focuses on the balance index sets of generalized book and ear expansion graphs.
- Research article
- Full Text
- Ars Combinatoria
- Volume 105
- Pages: 525-533
- Published: 31/07/2012
In this paper, we introduce the notion of \((\alpha, \beta)\)-generalized \(d\)-derivations on lattices and investigate some related properties. Also, using the notion of permuting \((\alpha, \beta)\)-triderivation, we characterize the distributive elements of a lattice.
- Research article
- Full Text
- Ars Combinatoria
- Volume 105
- Pages: 513-524
- Published: 31/07/2012
Suppose \(\{P_r\}\) is a nonempty family of paths for \(r \geq 3\), where \(P_r\) is a path on \(r\) vertices. An \(r\)-coloring of a graph \(G\) is said to be \(\{P_r\}\)-free if \(G\) contains no 2-colored subgraph isomorphic to any path \(P_r\) in \(\{P_r\}\). The minimum \(k\) such that \(G\) has a \(\{P_r\}\)-free coloring using \(k\) colors is called the \(\{P_r\}\)-free chromatic number of \(G\) and is denoted by \(\chi_{\{P_r\}}(G)\). If the family \(\{P_r\}\) consists of a single graph \(P_r\), then we use \(\chi_{P_r}(G)\). In this paper, \(\{P_r\}\)-free colorings of Sierpiński-like graphs are considered. In particular, \(\chi_{P_3}(S_n)\), \(\chi_{P_4}(S_n)\), \(\chi_{P_4}(S(n, k))\), \(\chi_{P_3}(S^{++}(n, k))\), and \(\chi_{P_4}(S^{++}(n, k))\) are determined.




