Béla Bajnok 1, Gunnar Brinkmann 2
1Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Gettysburg College Gettysburg, PA 17325 USA
2 Fakultat fiir Mathematik Universitit Bielefeld D 33501 Bielefeld Germany
Abstract:

In this paper, we look at triangle-free graphs with maximum degree three. By an inequality proved by K. Fraughnaugh\(^*\) in 1990, the number of vertices \(v\), edges \(e\), and independence \(i\) of such a graph satisfy \(e \geq \frac{13v}{2} – 14i\). We prove that there is a unique non-cubic, connected graph for which this inequality is sharp. For the cubic case, we describe a computer algorithm that established that two such extremal cubic graphs exist with \(v = 14\), and none for \(v = 28\) or \(42\). We give a complete list of cubic, and provide some new examples of non-cubic, triangle-free graphs with \(v \leq 36\) and independence ratio \(\frac{i}{v}\) less than \(\frac{3}{8}\).

Costas S. Iliopoulos1,2, Dennis Mocre3, W. F. Smyth 4,5
1Department of Computer Science King’s College London, University of London
2School of Computing Curtin University of Technology
3 School of Computing Curtin University of Technology
4Department of Computer Science & Systems McMaster University
5 School of Computing Curtin University of Technology
Abstract:

Fibonacci strings turn out to constitute worst cases for a number of computer algorithms which find generic patterns in strings. Examples of such patterns are repetitions, Abelian squares, and “covers”. In particular, we characterize in this paper the covers of a circular Fibonacci string \(\mathcal{C}(F_k)\) and show that they are \(\Theta(|F_k|^2)\) in number. We show also that, by making use of an appropriate encoding, these covers can be reported in \(\Theta(|F_k|)\) time. By contrast, the fastest known algorithm for computing the covers of an arbitrary circular string of length \(n\) requires time \(O(n \log n)\).

Katja Valentin 1
1 Mathematisches Institut Arndtstr. 2 D-35392 Giefen
Abstract:

A polychrome labeling of a simple and connected graph \(G = (V, E)\) by an abelian group \(A\) is a bijective map from \(V\) onto \(A\) such that the induced edge labeling \(f^*(vw) = f(v) + f(w)\), \(vw \in E\), is injective. The paper completes the characterization of polychrome paths and cycles begun in [3].

David Bedford1
1Department of Mathematics University of Keele Keele, Staffordshire ST5 58G England
Abstract:

We introduce a generalisation of the concept of a complete mapping of a group, which we call a quasi-complete mapping, and which leads us to a generalised form of orthogonality in Latin squares. In particular, the existence of a quasi-complete mapping of a group is shown to be sufficient for the existence of a pair of Latin squares such that if they are superimposed so as to form an array of unordered pairs, each unordered pair of distinct elements occurs exactly twice. We call such a pair of Latin squares quasi-orthogonal and prove that an abelian group possesses a quasi-complete mapping if and only if it is not of the form \(\mathbb{Z}_{4m+2} \oplus G\), \(|G|\) odd. In developing the theory of quasi-complete mappings, we show that the well-known concept of a quasi-complete Latin square arises quite naturally in this setting. We end the paper by giving a sufficient condition for the existence of a pair of quasi-orthogonal Latin squares which are also quasi-row-complete.

Ralph Faudree 1, Odile Favaron 2, Hao Li 2
1Department of Mathematical Sciences University of Memphis Memphis TN 38152, USA
2 LRI, Bat. 490 Université Paris-Sud 91405 Orsay cedex, France
Abstract:

For different properties \(\mathcal{P}\) of a connected graph \(G\), we characterize the connected graphs \(F\) (resp. the pairs \((X,Y)\) of connected graphs) such that \(G\) has Property \(\mathcal{P}\) if \(G\) does not admit \(F\) (resp. neither \(X\) nor \(Y\)) as an induced subgraph.

We consider here the lower independence, domination, and irredundance parameters, which are related by the well-known inequalities \(ir \leq \gamma \leq i \leq \alpha \leq \Gamma \leq IR\), and the properties \(\mathcal{P}\) correspond to the equality between some
of these parameters.

Thelma West1
1Department of Mathematics University of Southwestern Louisiana Lafayette, Louisiana 70504
Clive N. Galley1
1Department of Computer Science Kings College London University of London
Abstract:

Given that an array \(A[i_{1}, \ldots, i_{d}]\), \(1 \leq i_1 \leq m, \ldots 1 \leq i_d \leq m\), has a \emph{period} \(A[p_{1}, \ldots, p_{d}]\) of dimension \(p_1 \times \cdots p_{d}\) if \(A[i_{1}, \ldots, i_{d}] = A[i_{1} + p_{1}, \ldots, i_{d} + p_{d}]\)
for \(i_{1}, \ldots, i_{d} = 1, \ldots, m – (p_{1}, \ldots, p_{d})\). The \emph{period} of the array is \(A[p_{1}, \ldots, p_{d}]\) for the shortest such \(q = p_{1}, \ldots, p_{d}\).

Consider this array \(A\); we prove a lower bound on the computation of the period length less than \(m^{d}/2^d\) of \(A\) with time complexity
\[
\Omega({\log \log_a m}), \text{ where } a = m^{d^2}
\]
for \(O(m^d)\) work on the CRCW PRAM model of computation.

N.K. Thakare 1, B.N. Waphare1
1 Department of Mathematics University of Pune Pune -411007 Maharashtra, India
Abstract:

This paper contains a characterization of Baer \(^*\)-rings with finitely many elements in terms of matrix rings over finite fields. As an application, one can easily verify whether a given matrix ring over a finite field is a Baer \(^*\)-ring or not.

Michael A. Henning1, Grzegorz Kubicki 2
1 Department of Mathematics University of Natal Private Bag X01 Pietermaritzburg, 3209 South Africa
2Department of Mathematics University of Louisville Louisville KY 40292 USA
Abstract:

A function \(f: V \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) is defined to be an \(\mathbb{R}\)-dominating function of graph \(G = (V, E)\) if the sum of the function values over any closed neighbourhood is at least 1. That is, for every \(v \in V\),
\(f(N(v) \cup \{v\}) \geq 1\).

The \(\mathbb{R}\)-domination number \(\gamma_{\mathbb{R}}(G)\) of \(G\) is defined to be the infimum of \(f(V)\) taken over all \(\mathbb{R}\)-dominating functions \(f\) of \(G\).

In this paper, we investigate necessary and sufficient conditions for \(\gamma_{\mathbb{R}}(G) = \gamma(G)\), where \(\gamma(G)\) is the standard domination number.

E.J. Farrell1, J.C. Grell 1
1The Centre For Graph Polynomials Department of Mathematics and Computer Science The University of the West Indies St. Augustine, Trinidad
Abstract:

It is shown that the determinant of the variable adjacency matrix, and hence the determinant of the adjacency matrix of a graph, are circuit polynomials. From this, it is deduced that determinants of symmetric matrices are indeed circuit polynomials of associated graphs.
The results are then extended to general matrices

Peter Dankelmann1, Henda C. Swart 1, Ortrud R. Oellermann 2
1University of Natal Durban, South Africa
2 Brandon University Brandon, MB Canada
Abstract:

In this paper, we consider three conjectures of the computer program GRAFFITI. Moreover, we prove that every connected graph with minimum degree \(\delta\) and diameter \(d_m\) contains a matching of size at least \(\frac{\delta(d_m + 1)}{6}\). This inequality improves one of the conjectures under the additional assumption that \(\delta \geq 6\).

Rao Li1
1 Department of Mathematical Sciences University of Memphis Memphis, TN 38152
Abstract:

Let \(G\) be a \(1\)-tough graph of order \(n\). If \(|N(S)| \geq \frac{n + |S| – 1}{3}\)
for every non-empty subset \(S\) of the vertex set \(V(G)\) of \(G\), then \(G\) is hamiltonian.

N. Shalaby1, M.A. Al-Gwaiz 2
1 Department of Mathematics and Statistics Memorial University of Newfoundland St. John’s, Newfoundland Canada, A1C 587
2Department of Mathematics College of Science King Saud University Riyadh 1145, P.O. Box 2455 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Abstract:

We introduce generalized hooked, extended, and near-Skolem sequences and determine necessary conditions for their existence, the minimum number of hooks, and their permissible locations. We also produce computational results for small orders in each case.

P. Dukes1, H. Emerson1, G. MacGillivray1
1University of Victoria, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Victoria, B.C., Canada V8W 3P4. Research supported by NSERC.
Abstract:

Let \(H\) be a graph. An \(H\)-colouring of a graph \(G\) is an edge-preserving mapping of the vertices of \(G\) to the vertices of \(H\). We consider the Extendable \(H\)-colouring Problem, that is, the problem of deciding whether a partial \(H\)-colouring of some finite subset of the vertices of \(G\) can be extended to an \(H\)-colouring of \(G\). We show that, for a class of finitely described infinite graphs, Extendable \(H\)-colouring is undecidable for all finite non-bipartite graphs \(H\), and also for some finite bipartite graphs \(H\). Similar results are established when \(H\) is a finite reflexive graph.

Frank Harary 1, Teresa W. Haynes2, Peter J. Slater 3
1Department of Computer Science New Mexico State University Las Cruses, NM 88003
2Department of Mathematics East Tennessee State University Johnson City, TN 37614
3 Department of Mathematics University of Alabama in Huntsville Huntsville, AL 35899
Abstract:

Each vertex of a graph \(G = (V, E)\) dominates every vertex in its closed neighborhood. A set \(S \subset V\) is a dominating set if each vertex in \(V\) is dominated by at least one vertex of \(S\), and is an \emph{efficient dominating set} if each vertex in \(V\) is dominated by exactly one vertex of \(S\).

The domination excess \(de(G)\) is the smallest number of times that the vertices of \(G\) are dominated more than once by a minimum dominating set.

We study graphs having efficient dominating sets. In particular, we characterize such coronas and caterpillars, as well as the graphs \(G\) for which both \(G\) and \(\bar{G}\) have efficient dominating sets.

Then we investigate bounds on the domination excess in graphs which do not have efficient dominating sets and show that for any tree \(T\) of order \(n\),
\(de(T) \leq \frac{2n}{3} – 2\).

Johannes H. Hattingh 1, Michael A. Henning2
1Department of Mathematics Rand Afrikaans University P.O. Box 524 Auckland Park 2006 South Africa
2 Department of Mathematics University of Natal Private Bag X01 Pietermaritzburg 3209 South Africa
Abstract:

Let \(G = (V, E)\) be a graph. A vertex \(u\) strongly dominates a vertex \(v\) if \(uv \in E\) and \(\deg(u) > \deg(v)\). A set \(S \subseteq V\) is a strong dominating set of \(G\) if every vertex in \(V – S\) is strongly dominated by at least one vertex of \(S\).

The minimum cardinality among all strong dominating sets of \(G\) is called the strong domination number of \(G\) and is denoted by \(\gamma_{st}(G)\). This parameter was introduced by Sampathkumar and Pushpa Latha in [4].

In this paper, we investigate sharp upper bounds on the strong domination number for a tree and a connected graph. We show that for any tree \(T\) of order \(p > 2\) that is different from the tree obtained from a star \(K_{1,3}\) by subdividing each edge once,
\(\gamma_{st}(T) \leq \frac{4p – 1}{7}\)
and this bound is sharp.

For any connected graph \(G\) of order \(p \geq 3\), it is shown that \(\gamma_{st}(G) \leq \frac{2(p – 1)}{3}\) and this bound is sharp. We show that the decision problem corresponding to the computation of \(\gamma_{st}\) is NP-complete, even for bipartite or chordal graphs.

Ahmed M. Assaf1
1 Department of Mathematics Central Michigan University Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859
Abstract:

Let \(V\) be a finite set of order \(\nu\). A \((\nu, \kappa\lambda)\) packing design of index \(\lambda\) and block size \(\kappa\) is a collection of \(\kappa\)-element subsets, called blocks, such that every 2-subset of \(V\) occurs in at most \(\lambda\) blocks.

The packing problem is to determine the maximum number of blocks, \(\sigma(\nu\kappa\lambda)\), in a packing design. It is well known that
\(\sigma(\nu, \kappa\lambda) \leq \left[\frac{\nu}{\kappa}\left[ \frac{(\nu-1)}{(\kappa-1)}\lambda\right]\right] = \Psi(\nu, \kappa, \lambda)\), where \([x]\) is the largest integer satisfying \(x \geq [x]\).

It is shown here that \(\sigma(\nu, 5, \lambda) = \Psi(\nu, 5, \lambda) – e\) for all positive integers \(\nu \geq 5\) and \(7 \leq \lambda \leq 21\), where \(e = 1\text{ if } \lambda(\nu-1) \equiv 0 \pmod{\kappa-1} \text{ and } \lambda\nu\frac{(\nu-1)}{(\kappa-1)} \equiv 1 \pmod{\kappa}\) and \(e = 0\) otherwise with the following possible exceptions of \((\nu, \lambda)\) = (28,7), (32,7), (44,7), (32,9), (28,11), (39,11), (28,13), (28,15), (28,19), (39,21).

E-mail Alert

Add your e-mail address to receive upcoming issues of Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing (JCMCC).

Special Issues

The Combinatorial Press Editorial Office routinely extends invitations to scholars for the guest editing of Special Issues, focusing on topics of interest to the scientific community. We actively encourage proposals from our readers and authors, directly submitted to us, encompassing subjects within their respective fields of expertise. The Editorial Team, in conjunction with the Editor-in-Chief, will supervise the appointment of Guest Editors and scrutinize Special Issue proposals to ensure content relevance and appropriateness for the journal. To propose a Special Issue, kindly complete all required information for submission;