In this paper, we deal with recursive constructions for incomplete group divisible designs (IGDDs). Denoting \(GD[k,1,v; uv] – GD[k,1,n; un]\) by \((u,k)-IGD[v,n]\), we will prove, as an application, that a \((7,4)-IGD[v,n]\) exists if and only if \(v \geq 3n\) and \(\text{v – n} \equiv 0 \pmod{2}\).

We investigate the labellings of sum graphs, necessary conditions for a graph to be a sum graph, and the range of edge numbers of sum graphs.

A set \(S\) of vertices of a graph is \(k\)-independent if each vertex in \(S\) is adjacent to at most \(k-1\) other vertices in \(S\). A graph \(G\) is well-\(k\)-covered if every maximal \(k\)-independent set is maximum. We shall characterize the well-\(k\)-covered trees and for \(k=2\) all such graphs of girth \(8\) or more.

We derive a first-order recurrence for \(a_n(t) = \sum_{k=0}^{n} \frac{(-1)^{n-k}}{1+tk} \binom{n}{k}\) (\(t\) fixed \(t\neq -\frac{1}{m}, m\in \mathbb{N}\)). The first-order recurrence yields an alternative proof for Riordan’s theorem: \(a_n(t) = \binom{1/{t+n}}{n}^{-1}(-1)^n\) and also yields the ordinary generating function \(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_n(t) x^n\) for \(t \in \mathbb{N}.\)From the latter, one easily computes \(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a_n(t)\) which turns out to be the well-known \(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^n}{n+1} = \ln 2\) for \(t=1\). For \(t=2\), we get \(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} (-1)^n\frac{2n}{(2n+1)} = \frac{\ln(\sqrt{2}+1)}{\sqrt{2}}\).

Avis has shown that the number of vertices of a minimal triangle-free \(5\)-chromatic graph is no fewer than \(19\). Mycielski has shown that this number is no more than \(23\). In this paper, we improve these bounds to \(21\) and \(22\), respectively.

By a refinement of a rank argument used to prove a directed version of the Graham-Pollak theorem, we show that \(n\) bicliques are needed to partition the arc-set of the complement of a directed cycle.

In this paper, we obtain a polynomial inequality of degree three in \(m\) (the number of constraints), with coefficients involving the parameters \(\mu_i\)’s, on the existence of balanced arrays of strength four and with two symbols. Applications of the inequality to specific balanced arrays for obtaining an upper bound on the number of constraints are also discussed.

Let \(r(G)\) denote the rank, over the field of rational numbers, of the adjacency matrix of a graph \(G\). Van Nuffelen and Ellingham have obtained several inequalities which relate \(r(G)\) to other graph parameters such as chromatic number, clique number, Dilworth number, and domination number. We obtain additional results of this type. Our main theorem is that for graphs \(G\) having no isolated vertices, \(OIR(G) \leq r(G)\), where \(OIR(G)\) denotes the upper open irredundance number of \(G\).

Let \(D\) denote any balanced ternary design with block size three, index two, and \(\rho_2 = 1\) (that is, with each element occurring repeated in just one block). This paper shows that there exists such a design \(D\) on \(V\) elements containing exactly \(k\) pairs of repeated blocks if and only if \(V \equiv 0 \pmod{3}\), \(0\leq k \leq t_V = \frac{1}{6}V(V-3), \; \; k\neq t_V – 1, \text{and} (k,V)\neq(1,6)\).

For each integer \(v \geq 0\) and each \(\lambda \in \{4, 5, 7, 8\}\), the possible numbers of distinct blocks in a triple system of order \(v\) and index \(\lambda\) is determined. This essentially completes the determination of possible support sizes for triple systems with \(\lambda \leq 8\).